Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Mathematics/2008 October 1

Mathematics desk
< September 30 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 2 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Mathematics Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


October 1

edit

Recurrence

edit

Can someone please explain this to me: I have the Ramsey function  . I want to show that  . My book says that use a certain binomial coefficient. Can someone help? Thanks--Shahab (talk) 07:44, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh never mind. Pascal's identity was what I was looking for. The proof was by double induction.--Shahab (talk) 08:11, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

algebra

edit

They gave me this equation to use and I was ookay with it for a while. x = a1 b1 + a2 b2 / a1 + a2 but now they expect me to find b2!

I know I should bring it around so that the one side is x/a1 b1 + a2

But what do I do with a1 + a2? Do I put it so that x + (a1 + a2) or should I do it like x(a1 + a2)? --Jeevies (talk) 15:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Step by step, apply the same operation to both sides. Adding parentheses and operators as my assumption of what you mean with your equation we have
x = ( ( ( a1 * b1 ) + ( a2 * b2 ) ) / a1 ) + a2.
Thus your first step would transform to the equation
( x - a2 ) = ( ( ( a1 * b1 ) + ( a2 * b2 ) ) / a1 ) + a2 - a2 = ( ( ( a1 * b1 ) + ( a2 * b2 ) ) / a1 ).
Carry on from there. -- SGBailey (talk) 15:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
From the rest of the question I'm guessing they actually mean
x = (a1 b1 + a2 b2) / (a1 + a2)
That's the only way I can interpret the first steps they took. If I'm right the first step would be to multiply each side by (a1 + a2). -- Mad031683 (talk) 20:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]