Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/2021 November 29

Welcome to the Wikipedia Humanities Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

November 29

Peer Reviewed Jounal With a Non-Specialist Claim - How to Best Assess the Veracity?

Hi. I was reading "Aesthetics and Ephemerality: Observing and Preserving the Luxury Brand" (2009) with the intention of hopefully citing it in Ephemerality. And I did come across something useful, the quote reads: "Although present in all cultures and times, a philosophy of the ephemeral is perhaps best enunciated in the Japanese notion of wabi-sabi, a world-view that is centred on transience". In isolation, this is really useful for an overview on ephemerality and humanity, however, context is perhaps a hindrance.

This article was published California Management Review; the cited authors are either professors of management or marketing. They're not anthropologists, whose prerogative I'd expect the aforementioned quote to be – or an historian, or cultural scholar or sociologist. So, with that all being said, is this claim made by them - or at least propagated - reliable? Thanks. DMT Biscuit (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

You might note that the poisoned heart of a manager of marketing is concerned with other than the ephemeral, and they are citing Juniper, Andrew (2003). Wabi Sabi: The Japanese Art of Impermanence. OCLC 1045074093.. fiveby(zero) 18:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)