Wikipedia:Requests for comment/All
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: ()
Biographies
editTalk:2023 Nashville school shooting
| Should the Nashville school shooter's manifesto release be included in the article?
2601:19E:427E:5BB0:8BAB:B116:675B:AB5F (talk) 01:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Should the news on Linda Sun, being prosecuted for spying while working for Hochul be included?
2601:19E:427E:5BB0:8BAB:B116:675B:AB5F (talk) 01:21, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Should the article represent Yasuke's samurai status as debated? Brocade River Poems 02:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC) |
When describing Mahatma Gandhi's last hunger strike (or "fast-unto-death") undertaken on 12 January 1948, should we say that in addition to stemming the religious violence (or restoring the peace):
Please choose one of: 1(1), 1(2), 2(1), 2(2), 3(1), 3 (2), 4, 5(1) or 5(2). Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
| see discussion above. Should Asmongold's full name be included in the article? 23:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Which of the following images should serve as the infobox picture for William Howard Taft? Teknologi Positif (talk) 10:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Which of the following images should serve as the infobox picture for Philippe Pétain? Emiya1980 (talk) 01:33, 17 August 2024 (UTC) |
| This RfC concerns the first two sentences of the lead's second paragraph. (snapshot at the time of writing: [1])
Should "Following Khelif's victory ... misinformation surfaced on social media about her gender. False assertions about her gender were fuelled by Khelif's disqualification from the 2023 Women's World Boxing Championships ..." be changed to "Following Khelif's victory ... she became the subject of widespread public attention and misinformation regarding her gender. Khelif had previously been disqualified from the 2023 Women's World Boxing Championships ..." JSwift49 13:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Which photograph should serve as the lede image for Woodrow Wilson? Emiya1980 (talk) 02:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |
There is an ongoing dispute about what roles should appear in the lead sentence of the article on Tupac Shakur. Possibilities include (in alphabetical order):
The relevant policies are MOS:FIRSTBIO and MOS:ROLEBIO. A previous RfC on the same topic was held in 2017, where the consensus was "rapper and actor". Please comment on what roles should be included in the lead sentence, and why. Thank you, --LK (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Which of the following images should serve as the infobox picture for Martin van Buren? Emiya1980 (talk) 01:47, 10 August 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea
| Should South Korean girl groups like Blackpink and NewJeans be referred to as "South Korean K-pop girl group" in the lead? Cinemaandpolitics (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC) |
Economy, trade, and companies
edit| In the article section "Islam", should the following sentence be added at the beginning?
"Jinn have been called "an integral part" of the Muslim tradition[1] or faith,[2] "completely accepted" in official Islam;[3] prominently featured in folklore,[4] but also taken "quite seriously" by both medieval and modern Muslim scholars,[5] who "worked out" the consequences implied by their existence -- legal status, the possible relations between them and mankind, especially in questions of marriage and property.[3]" --Louis P. Boog (talk) 01:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC) |
When describing Mahatma Gandhi's last hunger strike (or "fast-unto-death") undertaken on 12 January 1948, should we say that in addition to stemming the religious violence (or restoring the peace):
Please choose one of: 1(1), 1(2), 2(1), 2(2), 3(1), 3 (2), 4, 5(1) or 5(2). Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
History and geography
edit| In the article section "Islam", should the following sentence be added at the beginning?
"Jinn have been called "an integral part" of the Muslim tradition[6] or faith,[7] "completely accepted" in official Islam;[3] prominently featured in folklore,[4] but also taken "quite seriously" by both medieval and modern Muslim scholars,[8] who "worked out" the consequences implied by their existence -- legal status, the possible relations between them and mankind, especially in questions of marriage and property.[3]" --Louis P. Boog (talk) 01:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Should the article represent Yasuke's samurai status as debated? Brocade River Poems 02:29, 2 September 2024 (UTC) |
| We have a disagreement on the origin of Kuči tribe. Currently, the article states that the tribe is Albanian in origin, but no citations address the claim directly. Current citations are based on language report 2 centuries after creation of the tribe. I tried dispute resolution but editors mentioned didn't want to participate and just ignored it. Should we change origins to mixed? I will provide more info in a reply to this RfC
02:14, 1 September 2024 (UTC) |
What should be included in the |native_name= parameter used by the {{Infobox country}} on articles about Korean states that existed prior to the 15th century? Remsense ‥ 论 13:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
|
| A two part question: (a) Should Gustav Whitehead's No. 21 machine be discussed in the article 'history' section? (b) Should Gustav Whitehead's No. 21 machine be included in the list of 'flying cars' found in the article? AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
What should be stated in the infobox's Ethnic groups field?
See the talk page and DRN discussions. Provide your answers as Option 1, 2, 3, or 4 with brief explanatory statements in the Survey. Do not reply to the statements of other editors in the Survey. Back-and-forth discussion should go in the Discussion section; that's what it's for. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 13:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
When describing Mahatma Gandhi's last hunger strike (or "fast-unto-death") undertaken on 12 January 1948, should we say that in addition to stemming the religious violence (or restoring the peace):
Please choose one of: 1(1), 1(2), 2(1), 2(2), 3(1), 3 (2), 4, 5(1) or 5(2). Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Which of the following images should serve as the infobox picture for Philippe Pétain? Emiya1980 (talk) 01:33, 17 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Question Should the Israeli flag be displayed in the article? Please refer to the various discussions and comments above. When commenting please remember that this is WP:NOTAVOTE and to cite applicable policy and guidelines where possible. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Which of the following images should serve as the infobox picture for Martin van Buren? Emiya1980 (talk) 01:47, 10 August 2024 (UTC) |
Per discussions above, these suggestions have made for a new Mughal dynasty lead:
Kindly, state the preferred options below. PadFoot (talk) 12:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC) |
Language and linguistics
edit| In the article section "Islam", should the following sentence be added at the beginning?
"Jinn have been called "an integral part" of the Muslim tradition[9] or faith,[10] "completely accepted" in official Islam;[3] prominently featured in folklore,[4] but also taken "quite seriously" by both medieval and modern Muslim scholars,[11] who "worked out" the consequences implied by their existence -- legal status, the possible relations between them and mankind, especially in questions of marriage and property.[3]" --Louis P. Boog (talk) 01:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC) |
What should be included in the |native_name= parameter used by the {{Infobox country}} on articles about Korean states that existed prior to the 15th century? Remsense ‥ 论 13:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
|
When describing Mahatma Gandhi's last hunger strike (or "fast-unto-death") undertaken on 12 January 1948, should we say that in addition to stemming the religious violence (or restoring the peace):
Please choose one of: 1(1), 1(2), 2(1), 2(2), 3(1), 3 (2), 4, 5(1) or 5(2). Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
Maths, science, and technology
edit| In the article section "Islam", should the following sentence be added at the beginning?
"Jinn have been called "an integral part" of the Muslim tradition[12] or faith,[13] "completely accepted" in official Islam;[3] prominently featured in folklore,[4] but also taken "quite seriously" by both medieval and modern Muslim scholars,[14] who "worked out" the consequences implied by their existence -- legal status, the possible relations between them and mankind, especially in questions of marriage and property.[3]" --Louis P. Boog (talk) 01:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
The reliability of Universe Guide is:
|
| A two part question: (a) Should Gustav Whitehead's No. 21 machine be discussed in the article 'history' section? (b) Should Gustav Whitehead's No. 21 machine be included in the list of 'flying cars' found in the article? AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
Art, architecture, literature, and media
edit| In the article section "Islam", should the following sentence be added at the beginning?
"Jinn have been called "an integral part" of the Muslim tradition[15] or faith,[16] "completely accepted" in official Islam;[3] prominently featured in folklore,[4] but also taken "quite seriously" by both medieval and modern Muslim scholars,[17] who "worked out" the consequences implied by their existence -- legal status, the possible relations between them and mankind, especially in questions of marriage and property.[3]" --Louis P. Boog (talk) 01:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
| Am I Racist? is likely to be a... let's call it... frequently-edited article over the next few weeks. As of right now, its only two citations are from twitchy.com. I've seen a few mentions of it in the archives, but mostly in the context of other media properties its parent company owns. Its page Twitchy calls it a "Twitter aggregator and commentary website". That doesn't sound super reliable to me.
Is using Twitchy justified in this case? Snowman304|talk 06:59, 29 August 2024 (UTC) |
A request for the input on the talk page of Deadpool & Wolverine on the section Talk:Deadpool & Wolverine#Critical reception: subsection Talk:Deadpool & Wolverine#Survey. We have tried to form a consensus on how to deal with the unclear critical reception and whether/how it should be reflected in the header of the article.
Please note: If the consensus supports Question #1, then the statement with the most support from Question #2 will be selected. BarntToust (talk) 14:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC) |
Should the creation date of Electric Boogie be
versions? I mean not only the date, but explanations based on RS as well. --Altenmann >talk 22:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Which book cover should be displayed in the infobox of And Then There Were None: the 1939 cover with the original UK title that includes a racial slur, or the 1940 US cover with the current title And Then There Were None? MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:41, 25 August 2024 (UTC) |
| see discussion above. Should Asmongold's full name be included in the article? 23:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Ariana Grande discography
| Should the sales for the albums Positions (Oct 2020), and Eternal Sunshine (Mar 2024), be added to the sales column of their table entries in Ariana Grande discography? Data is sourced from Billboard for the first two weeks of Positions and Luminate's official mid-year reports for 2021 and 2024. Flabshoe1 (talk) 20:44, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |
There is an ongoing dispute about what roles should appear in the lead sentence of the article on Tupac Shakur. Possibilities include (in alphabetical order):
The relevant policies are MOS:FIRSTBIO and MOS:ROLEBIO. A previous RfC on the same topic was held in 2017, where the consensus was "rapper and actor". Please comment on what roles should be included in the lead sentence, and why. Thank you, --LK (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:2024 United States presidential election
There are two questions:
|
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea
| Should South Korean girl groups like Blackpink and NewJeans be referred to as "South Korean K-pop girl group" in the lead? Cinemaandpolitics (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC) |
Politics, government, and law
edit| Should centre-left be included in the infobox? Please see the above discussion for relevant sources. Helper201 (talk) 03:28, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Can this content be restored to the page?
When asked by J. K. Rowling in July 2024 whether transgender women with a gender recognition certificate have the right to use women-only spaces, Starmer replied, "No. They don't have that right. They shouldn't".[18][19] Helper201 (talk) 02:59, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:2023 Nashville school shooting
| Should the Nashville school shooter's manifesto release be included in the article?
2601:19E:427E:5BB0:8BAB:B116:675B:AB5F (talk) 01:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:2024 United States presidential election
| Hello,
Regarding Trump's main photo of "2024 United States presidential election", there were several discussions previously. - example link: Talk:2024_United_States_presidential_election/Archive_7 I'd like to confirm which photos can be used. I've included the top-voted options based on my understanding, but I think limiting it to three additional choices will give us the most efficient results. If a new, better image emerges, we can compare it after this RFC process
>Every U.S. elections always using official portrait but not in presidential primaries, for example, in 1992 and 1996, Bill Clinton's official portrait was used for 2 times although two times were sequence 4 years ago. weakness of this photo: considering that the age is a concern among some voters, the images of relatively recent can minimise that concern. Trump's 2017 portrait doesn't show a drastically different Trump/no change in appearance.
>the long-standing "smug" image; This can be seen as an unkind and arrogant, but on the other hand, it can be seen as a confident looking
>it is smiling freindly photo with his face,like Kamala but Trump's expression in the his body is tilted to the left instead of facing the camera.
>it is smiling freindly photo and suitable camerawork - example: at eye level, face and body facing camera and he is also smiling like Kamala but there's just an impression that makes him look uneasy. (Above description: I've compiled a summary of some users feedback.) Goodtiming8871 (talk) 23:47, 2 September 2024 (UTC) |
| The following discussion took place nearly three years ago, just after I stopped monitoring the page. I would like to re-open the discussion and extend it to other sources that users have attempted to add. Free speech scholar (talk) 21:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:United States and state-sponsored terrorism
| Does the following sentence in United States and state-sponsored terrorism#Syria constitute
disallowed original research in the sense that it is an editorial synthesis of published material that implies a new conclusion?
|
When describing Mahatma Gandhi's last hunger strike (or "fast-unto-death") undertaken on 12 January 1948, should we say that in addition to stemming the religious violence (or restoring the peace):
Please choose one of: 1(1), 1(2), 2(1), 2(2), 3(1), 3 (2), 4, 5(1) or 5(2). Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Which of the following images should serve as the infobox picture for William Howard Taft? Teknologi Positif (talk) 10:20, 18 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Which of the following images should serve as the infobox picture for Philippe Pétain? Emiya1980 (talk) 01:33, 17 August 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Committee for a Workers' International (2019)
| In the past month someone copypasted the entire history section from Committee for a Workers' International (1974) into this article.[2]. As a result much of the content of both articles is the same, except for the list of pre-2019 sections. Should the articles be merged or should they remain separate and should the pre-2019 history be removed give. the duplication?
Also multiple accounts that either claim membership in the CWI or appear to be members of the organization have been editing this article, removing links to the 1974 article, and obscuring the fact originally asserted by the current group that a minority faction "refounded" the organisation in 2019 and tnat it and another organisation, which was originally referred to as CWI Majority but has since changed its name to International Socialist Alternative, both claim to be continuations of the original group. References to this have been removed from the lede and infobox. So should the two CWI articles be merged or remain separate and how should the competing claims to continuity be dealt with? Wellington Bay (talk) 11:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Question Should the Israeli flag be displayed in the article? Please refer to the various discussions and comments above. When commenting please remember that this is WP:NOTAVOTE and to cite applicable policy and guidelines where possible. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:Russian invasion of Ukraine
Should the lead mention Russia's pre-invasion demand for a ban on future expansion of NATO to Ukraine? A proposed wording: "In late 2021, Russia massed troops near Ukraine's borders and issued demands including a ban on future expansion of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to Ukraine." — Goszei (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Which photograph should serve as the lede image for Woodrow Wilson? Emiya1980 (talk) 02:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies
There are two questions:
|
Talk:2024 United States presidential election
There are two questions:
|
| Which of the following images should serve as the infobox picture for Martin van Buren? Emiya1980 (talk) 01:47, 10 August 2024 (UTC) |
Religion and philosophy
edit| In the article section "Islam", should the following sentence be added at the beginning?
"Jinn have been called "an integral part" of the Muslim tradition[20] or faith,[21] "completely accepted" in official Islam;[3] prominently featured in folklore,[4] but also taken "quite seriously" by both medieval and modern Muslim scholars,[22] who "worked out" the consequences implied by their existence -- legal status, the possible relations between them and mankind, especially in questions of marriage and property.[3]" --Louis P. Boog (talk) 01:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC) |
When describing Mahatma Gandhi's last hunger strike (or "fast-unto-death") undertaken on 12 January 1948, should we say that in addition to stemming the religious violence (or restoring the peace):
Please choose one of: 1(1), 1(2), 2(1), 2(2), 3(1), 3 (2), 4, 5(1) or 5(2). Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Does the article contain any NPOV issue? JoaquimCebuano (talk) 17:10, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |
Society, sports, and culture
edit| In the article section "Islam", should the following sentence be added at the beginning?
"Jinn have been called "an integral part" of the Muslim tradition[23] or faith,[24] "completely accepted" in official Islam;[3] prominently featured in folklore,[4] but also taken "quite seriously" by both medieval and modern Muslim scholars,[25] who "worked out" the consequences implied by their existence -- legal status, the possible relations between them and mankind, especially in questions of marriage and property.[3]" --Louis P. Boog (talk) 01:45, 5 September 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:2023 Nashville school shooting
| Should the Nashville school shooter's manifesto release be included in the article?
2601:19E:427E:5BB0:8BAB:B116:675B:AB5F (talk) 01:44, 4 September 2024 (UTC) |
| The following discussion took place nearly three years ago, just after I stopped monitoring the page. I would like to re-open the discussion and extend it to other sources that users have attempted to add. Free speech scholar (talk) 21:14, 29 August 2024 (UTC) |
What should be stated in the infobox's Ethnic groups field?
See the talk page and DRN discussions. Provide your answers as Option 1, 2, 3, or 4 with brief explanatory statements in the Survey. Do not reply to the statements of other editors in the Survey. Back-and-forth discussion should go in the Discussion section; that's what it's for. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 13:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
| Should the "ethnic groups" parameter on the infobox be ommited in favor of the "national languages" parameter which is already present? NAADAAN (talk) 23:32, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
When describing Mahatma Gandhi's last hunger strike (or "fast-unto-death") undertaken on 12 January 1948, should we say that in addition to stemming the religious violence (or restoring the peace):
Please choose one of: 1(1), 1(2), 2(1), 2(2), 3(1), 3 (2), 4, 5(1) or 5(2). Fowler&fowler«Talk» 13:13, 22 August 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports
| In articles on tournaments, should a full image gallery of all the tournament's venues, typically in a § Venues section such as 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup § Venues and 2023 Rugby World Cup § Venues, be encouraged or discouraged? To clarify, this is not a discussion on the methods in which such galleries can be implemented. This is a discussion on having them in the first place, and whether or not they add value to an article for readers with perhaps only a casual interest in sports. AFC Vixen 🦊 15:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC) |
| This RfC concerns the first two sentences of the lead's second paragraph. (snapshot at the time of writing: [3])
Should "Following Khelif's victory ... misinformation surfaced on social media about her gender. False assertions about her gender were fuelled by Khelif's disqualification from the 2023 Women's World Boxing Championships ..." be changed to "Following Khelif's victory ... she became the subject of widespread public attention and misinformation regarding her gender. Khelif had previously been disqualified from the 2023 Women's World Boxing Championships ..." JSwift49 13:31, 12 August 2024 (UTC) |
Talk:2024 United States presidential election
There are two questions:
|
Wikipedia style and naming
editWhat should be included in the |native_name= parameter used by the {{Infobox country}} on articles about Korean states that existed prior to the 15th century? Remsense ‥ 论 13:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
|
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section
| Should citations be included for most claims in an article's lead, just like in the body? 19:51, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia policies and guidelines
editWikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period
Welcome back! Now that the trial of (Proposal 3b: Make the first two days discussion-only (trial)) has ended, we return to discuss its pros, cons, and (later) whether to retain it. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 09:06, 6 September 2024 (UTC) |
| Question Should the Israeli flag be displayed in the article? Please refer to the various discussions and comments above. When commenting please remember that this is WP:NOTAVOTE and to cite applicable policy and guidelines where possible. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Notability (species)
| Shall Wikipedia:Notability (species) be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline? WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC) |
WikiProjects and collaborations
edit
Wikipedia technical issues and templates
edit
Wikipedia proposals
editWikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024
| The purpose of this request for comment is to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2024 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by the existing rules. 01:30, 1 September 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Perennial proposals
| Based on discussions from 2019, 2022 (×2), April 2024, and June 2024, as well as Talk:Suicide/crisis hotline link, should we add an entry to Wikipedia:Perennial proposals about proposals for adding prominent links to crisis hotlines on articles? 22:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:Notability (species)
| Shall Wikipedia:Notability (species) be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline? WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC) |
Unsorted
edit
User names
edit
|
Navigation: Archives • Instructions for closing administrators • |
This page is for bringing attention to usernames which may be in violation of Wikipedia's username policy. Before listing a username here, consider if it should be more appropriately reported elsewhere, or if it needs to be reported at all:
- Report blatantly inappropriate usernames, such as usernames that are obscene or inflammatory, to Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention.
- For other cases involving vandalism, personal attacks or other urgent issues, try Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents; blatant vandalism can also be reported at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism, which is sometimes a better option.
Do NOT post here if:
- the user in question has made no recent edits.
- you wish to have the block of a user reviewed. Instead, discuss the block with the blocking administrator (see also Wikipedia:Blocking policy § Unblocking).
Before adding a name here you MUST ensure that the user in question:
- has been warned about their username (with e.g. {{subst:uw-username}}) and has been allowed time to address the concern on their user talk page.
- has disagreed with the concern, refused to change their username and/or continued to edit without replying to the warning.
- is not already blocked.
If, after having followed all the steps above, you still believe the username violates Wikipedia's username policy, you may list it here with an explanation of which part of the username policy you think has been violated. After posting, please alert the user of the discussion (with e.g. {{subst:UsernameDiscussion}}). You may also invite others who have expressed concern about the username to comment on the discussion by use of this template.
Add new requests below, using the syntax {{subst:rfcn1|username|2=reason ~~~~}}.
Tools: Special:ListUsers, Special:BlockList
Reports
editPlease remember that this is not a vote, rather, it is a place where editors can come when they are unsure what to do with a username, and to get outside opinions (hence it's named "requests for comment"). There are no set time limits to the period of discussion.
- Place your report below this line. Please put new reports on the top of the list.
- ^ Mark A. Caudill (2006). Twilight in the Kingdom: Understanding the Saudis. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 92. ISBN 9780313084850.
Jinn are an integral part of both traditional and Gnostic Islamic belief.
- ^ William E. Burns (2022). They Believed That?: A Cultural Encyclopedia of Superstitions and the Supernatural around the World. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 137. ISBN 9781440878480.
Jinn are considered by some authorities to be an integral part of the Islamic faith due to their inclusion in the Quran.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n D.B. MacDonald; H. Massé; P.N. Boratav; K.A. Nizami; P. Voorhoeve (eds.). "Djinn". Encyclopaedia of Islam New Edition Online (EI-2 English). Retrieved 27 July 2024.
II. In official Islam the existence of the d̲j̲inn was completely accepted, as it is to This day, and the full consequences implied by their existence were worked out. Their legal status in all respects was discussed and fixed, and the possible relations between them and mankind, especially in questions of marriage and property, were examined.
- ^ a b c d e f g Olomi, Ali A. (2021). "14. Jinn in the Quran". The Routledge Companion to the Qur'an. N.Y.: Routledge. p. 149. Retrieved 24 July 2024.
The jinn feature prominently in Islamic folklore as ambivalent and mischievous supernatural forces.
- ^ Coeli Fitzpatrick; Adam Hani Walker, eds. (2014). Muhammad in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia of the Prophet of God. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 321. ISBN 9781610691789.
- ^ Mark A. Caudill (2006). Twilight in the Kingdom: Understanding the Saudis. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 92. ISBN 9780313084850.
Jinn are an integral part of both traditional and Gnostic Islamic belief.
- ^ William E. Burns (2022). They Believed That?: A Cultural Encyclopedia of Superstitions and the Supernatural around the World. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 137. ISBN 9781440878480.
Jinn are considered by some authorities to be an integral part of the Islamic faith due to their inclusion in the Quran.
- ^ Coeli Fitzpatrick; Adam Hani Walker, eds. (2014). Muhammad in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia of the Prophet of God. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 321. ISBN 9781610691789.
- ^ Mark A. Caudill (2006). Twilight in the Kingdom: Understanding the Saudis. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 92. ISBN 9780313084850.
Jinn are an integral part of both traditional and Gnostic Islamic belief.
- ^ William E. Burns (2022). They Believed That?: A Cultural Encyclopedia of Superstitions and the Supernatural around the World. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 137. ISBN 9781440878480.
Jinn are considered by some authorities to be an integral part of the Islamic faith due to their inclusion in the Quran.
- ^ Coeli Fitzpatrick; Adam Hani Walker, eds. (2014). Muhammad in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia of the Prophet of God. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 321. ISBN 9781610691789.
- ^ Mark A. Caudill (2006). Twilight in the Kingdom: Understanding the Saudis. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 92. ISBN 9780313084850.
Jinn are an integral part of both traditional and Gnostic Islamic belief.
- ^ William E. Burns (2022). They Believed That?: A Cultural Encyclopedia of Superstitions and the Supernatural around the World. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 137. ISBN 9781440878480.
Jinn are considered by some authorities to be an integral part of the Islamic faith due to their inclusion in the Quran.
- ^ Coeli Fitzpatrick; Adam Hani Walker, eds. (2014). Muhammad in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia of the Prophet of God. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 321. ISBN 9781610691789.
- ^ Mark A. Caudill (2006). Twilight in the Kingdom: Understanding the Saudis. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 92. ISBN 9780313084850.
Jinn are an integral part of both traditional and Gnostic Islamic belief.
- ^ William E. Burns (2022). They Believed That?: A Cultural Encyclopedia of Superstitions and the Supernatural around the World. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 137. ISBN 9781440878480.
Jinn are considered by some authorities to be an integral part of the Islamic faith due to their inclusion in the Quran.
- ^ Coeli Fitzpatrick; Adam Hani Walker, eds. (2014). Muhammad in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia of the Prophet of God. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 321. ISBN 9781610691789.
- ^ Hunter, Ross (2 July 2024). "Keir Starmer: transgender women 'don't have right' to use women-only spaces". The National. Archived from the original on 7 July 2024. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
- ^ Tabberer, Jamie. "Keir Starmer says transgender women 'don't have the right' to use women-only spaces, even if they have a GRC". Yahoo! News. Attitude. Archived from the original on 3 July 2024. Retrieved 8 July 2024.
- ^ Mark A. Caudill (2006). Twilight in the Kingdom: Understanding the Saudis. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 92. ISBN 9780313084850.
Jinn are an integral part of both traditional and Gnostic Islamic belief.
- ^ William E. Burns (2022). They Believed That?: A Cultural Encyclopedia of Superstitions and the Supernatural around the World. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 137. ISBN 9781440878480.
Jinn are considered by some authorities to be an integral part of the Islamic faith due to their inclusion in the Quran.
- ^ Coeli Fitzpatrick; Adam Hani Walker, eds. (2014). Muhammad in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia of the Prophet of God. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 321. ISBN 9781610691789.
- ^ Mark A. Caudill (2006). Twilight in the Kingdom: Understanding the Saudis. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 92. ISBN 9780313084850.
Jinn are an integral part of both traditional and Gnostic Islamic belief.
- ^ William E. Burns (2022). They Believed That?: A Cultural Encyclopedia of Superstitions and the Supernatural around the World. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 137. ISBN 9781440878480.
Jinn are considered by some authorities to be an integral part of the Islamic faith due to their inclusion in the Quran.
- ^ Coeli Fitzpatrick; Adam Hani Walker, eds. (2014). Muhammad in History, Thought, and Culture: An Encyclopedia of the Prophet of God. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. p. 321. ISBN 9781610691789.