Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Scottish Parliament Committee Room Ceiling

Scottish Parliament Committee Room Ceiling edit

 
Scottish Parliament Committee Room Ceiling

Displays Enric Miralles and Bernadette Tagliabue's command over form to create almost painter like compositions; appears in Scottish Parliament Building, Self created.

  • Nominate and support. - Mcginnly 12:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

  • I don't think this would make it, too much noise, a little blurry and the window has blown out highlights. I also cant tell what the main subject is. -Ravedave 14:01, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yeah it was a very grey, dark day in Scotland, trouble is, this is one of the rooms in the parliament which is not publicly accessible and so rephotographing it is going to be problematic for me. Do you have any advice on how i might be able to improve it in photoshop? The blown out highlights of the window I quite like though as this is supposed to be a dramatic image of the interplay of light on form. As to what the subject is - it's a mad sculptural ceiling in the scottish parliament, it's not a familiar shape. The things hanging from the ceiling are lighting cans and cameras. I was including it to try demonstrate a clever grasp of compostion that the architect has managed, by being easily able to capture a balanced 2d composition from a real life structural form. --Mcginnly 14:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • I dont think you can fix it with pshp. When overexposed you loose infromation. You could try submitting it as an FPC on commons, they usually go for more artsy type stuff where as FPC on wikipedia is more for stuff that is encyclopedic. -Ravedave 00:51, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • In any case, the subject isn't particularly interesting as far as I can tell - some modern lights hanging from a white ceiling? And the photography, while adequate, is not "stunning". I think it would be very difficult to take a particularly nice photo of a monochromatic 3d shape. Sadly :/ Stevage 09:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seconder: