Wikipedia:Peer review/Zhou Tong (monk)/archive2

Zhou Tong (monk)

I've added a great deal more info to the page. I know one major issue is the "Notes and References" secton. I realize that they are supposed to be separate. (Ghostexorcist 11:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Actually, notes and references are not required to be separate. I think they are fine how they are, personally. One problem, however, is that many of your references and external links do not have good descriptions (or have no descriptions at all). Kaldari 21:52, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you care to elaborate on which links these are? (Ghostexorcist 22:55, 26 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Here are some examples:

Answer 1
Answer 6
Praying Mantis
及冠、及笄各有什么礼俗？ (Chinese only)
CNMDB (Chinese only)
http://culture.163.com/culture/editor/serial/050614/050614_149548.html (Chinese only)
正文第三回问我源何方问我路何向 (Chinese only)

Kaldari 23:06, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I get what your a saying now. I thought you meant the material on those webpages were not very good sources. You meant that I needed to elongate the description so people will know what they are about to be linked to. I'll rename them. (Ghostexorcist 00:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I would like to see someone rewrite the part of the Fictional section which details Zhou tong's character in Yue Fei's fictional biography. I wrote it in a rush and now that I read it, it seems really choppy. Could someone do this without deleting any of the original material? (Ghostexorcist 12:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

-------------------------------------------

It doesn't look like anyone cares about this article, but I'm putting my thoughts on here for possible feedback. Because I use two different Yue Fei biographies, it can get confusing when I refer to one in one sentence and then the other in the next. So, my proposal is to link all the biography names back to the sections of the article which describes them. This way, when a person gets confused, they can link back to either section which says "historical" or "fictional". They will know the difference. Thoughts?(Ghostexorcist 21:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]