Wikipedia:Peer review/Wymington/archive2

Wymington edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I am reaching an impasse as to how to continue to add to and improve the article and would greatly appreciate outside input into what can be done next or potential sources for further information on the village. Input on the demography and geography sections as well as recommendations for additional sections that would help the article along would be most appreciated! You may notice that this is a rapid-succession peer review request for the same article, and it is. The previous request was fulfilled by an editor using ChatGPT to generate feedback, which, though done in good faith and with good intentions by the editor, was of questionable value.

Thanks! nf utvol (talk) 17:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720 edit

Comments after a quick skim:

"Four tenants were referenced in the survey, two of whom held manors." Needs a citation
Take a look at some other city articles like Hamilton, Ontario or Brownhills for ideas on sections to add and how to expand the Geography section.
""2 NEOLITHIC FLINTS". Citations should not be in all caps per MOS:ALLCAPS
Try looking for more sources on Google Scholar, WP:LIBRARY, archive.org and your local library system.

I hope this helps. Z1720 (talk) 02:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]