I've listed this article for peer review because…
It has the potential to provide a good overview of the basics of wrestling, but I think more emphasis could be given in the section on folk wrestling. Also, grammatical and spelling errors may need to be checked and corrected as well.
I would also like to find out if people think the writing style of the article is clear, sufficient, and comprehensive enough (without being too burdensome to read) for the average reader. Other changes are also welcome that will improve the article. I would like to know if it has any potential to be above B status on the quality scale.
Thanks,
Wikiman86 (talk) 23:24, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Urr, I would just say that nominating seven articles at one time for PR is not a good idea. I would withdraw the other six articles, leaving Wrestling, which would appear the most important article to be (hopefully) reviewed. Mattyness (talk) 12:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Just wondering, why is it such a bad idea? I mean the same person doesn't have to review all of the articles. Please explain yourself. Wikiman86 (talk) 15:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it's hard enough to find a person to review one article at PR, let alone seven. But feel free to not follow my advice. Mattyness (talk) 15:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- I would also add that in the case of related articles (such as these) it is often useful to have one model article, get that to GA or FA, then work on the others based on the successful model. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)