Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it is an important historical part of computing history (and 470 other pages link to it). also i feel it shoukd be listed as importance "Top", it is that fundamental to computer science, however that is something that definitely needs some consensus and feedback on, you don't put computing articles at "top" without a good reason and careful consideration.
Thanks, Lkcl (talk) 23:53, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi @Lkcl: I am sorry that it has taken so long for someone to respond to this. Typically, articles are assessed as "Top" importance by the Wikiproject. An article's condition or prose does not usually contribute to this designation. I suggest reaching out to Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing and asking someone from that project if its importance can be upgraded. As for the article, please ensure that everything is cited; there should be a citation at the end of each paragraph, minimum. You can also reach out to people on Wikiproject Computing for additional help on this technical article, as I do not have the expertise to evaluate this. Z1720 (talk) 15:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Lkcl: are you still interested in getting comments for this PR? Have you reached out to any editors? Z1720 (talk) 16:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- Closing due to inactivity. Z1720 (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC)