Tornadoes of 2007 edit
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for June 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because, I'm interested in trying at least to get the article as a good article nominee.
Thanks, Rvk41 (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comments from Juliancolton (talk · contribs)
- A decent article. Needs some work for GA or FA, though.
- Given the length of the article, I'd realy like to see the article expanded some.
- Per MoS, remove the link in the bold title in the first sentence of the lead.
- Make sure there are non-breaking spaces after all numbers.
- Per MoS (?), remove the Synopsis section and add it to the lead.
- Sourcing is overall weak. Make sure every single entry has at least one reference.
- Why are the Fujita ratings in bold?
- Prose needs a copyedit, especially to remove unencyclopediac writing, redundant words, and such.
- Make sure all of the references are in {{cite web}}, or a similar format.
- I havn't done an in-depth analysis of the prose, but that should kep you busy for a while. If you found this review usefull, you might want to review an article at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog, which is where I found this article. Cheers! Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)