Wikipedia:Peer review/Tintin in Tibet/archive1

Tintin in Tibet edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because this article will soon be submitted to WP:FAC and hopefully someday become a Featured Article (it fairly recently become a Good Article). Thank-you for providing your copy editing skills. What this entire article needs is a tough, thorough review as if it were already going through FAC. Thanks, and I hope you enjoy reading it! Prhartcom (talk) 03:50, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried nominating it at the WP:GCE? Brigade Piron (talk) 10:13, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I'll try that after I give this one a try. Prhartcom (talk) 17:49, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have just listed it there also. Thanks. Prhartcom (talk) 12:42, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did no one peer review this article? Today it was closed and archived with the erroneous statement that it had been peer reviewed. Prhartcom (talk) 14:24, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]