Wikipedia:Peer review/Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers/archive1

Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers edit

This peer review discussion has been closed.
Dear Wikipedians,
I've listed this article for peer review because i feel the article has improved a lot on the quality of contents. Moreover i feel the article's current Quality Scale (Class-B) can be upgraded upwards to GA or A from B-Class. Pls review the article & provide your valuable Suggestions / feedback for improving the article.

Thanks, Raj6644 (talk) 13:53, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bejinhan's comments BejinhanTalk 14:15, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • There are huge potions of the article without references. For example, see below. There are many other sections needing references too.

Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Limited (TNPL) was formed by the Government of Tamil Nadu, one of the most environmentally compliant paper mills in the world in April 1979 as a Public Limited Company under the provisions of the Companies Act,1956.

TNPL exports about 1/5th of its production to more than 30 countries. Manufacturing of quality paper for the past two and half decades from bagasse is an index of the company’s technological competence. A strong record in adopting minimum impact best process technology, responsible waste management, reduced pollution load and commitment to the corporate social responsibility make the company one of the most environmentally compliant paper mills in the world.

  • There seems to be a strong WP:COI tone in the article. Are you involved with the company? Many parts of the article has promotional sentences. They have to be cut out.
  • Frankly, the article does not even meet B-class article yet, and I would not encourage you to try GA or A-class at the moment.
  • Try to get an independent editor to edit the article.
Hi Bejinhan, Thanks for your suggestion. Right now the article is completely formatted & rewritten to meet the WP:standards. Still working on improving the contents of the article. Raj 6644(தமிழன்) 11:18, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! It's looks much better now. Good job! :) Bejinhan talks 14:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]