| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because i want to make it a GA article and i wanted to get some feedback before I put it up for GA
Thanks, Dmanrulz180 (talk) 14:41, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
- Some comments
- Anything in the WP:LEAD should already be mentioned in the article
- The phrase "excellent table fare" may not be understandable to all English readers. Its palatability should also be sourced.
- Move the bit about the NC into a "Society and culture" section, perhaps. Ideally a WP:SECONDARY source is best for analysis and detail of the event.
- The article's title should be bolded (WP:BOLDTITLE)
- The common name should also be bolded in the first sentence
- I don't know why Spot should be capitalized. I see brook trout is not, and there is this for guidance Wikipedia:CAPITAL#Animals.2C_plants.2C_and_other_organisms
- "frequently caught by recreational anglers" is a vague/generic statement that may be best removed or sourced
- detritus is mentioned in the lead, but not the body of the article for example
I hope these comments are useful. When you address them let me know at my talk page if you'd like for me to take another look or to ask me a question there. I won't have this peer review on my watchlist. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 08:11, 12 September 2012 (UTC)