| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I am planning to work on achieving FA status for this article, and I am most interested in how to improve the "Politics", "Economy" and "Culture" sections. I would like to see what is right with the article and what is wrong with it so I can improve it. I am also interested on whether the lead is okay, or how it can be improved. In general suggestions on improving the article as a whole are welcome, even if they are not related to the sections I mentioned. I have never done this before so I might have done something wrong... Sorry if that's the case!
Thanks, Bidezko (talk) 11:09, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- I’m just another editor and have no real authority here, but from what I can tell, it looks pretty good. As for the three sections you mentioned, perhaps a merger of the Demographics and the Culture sections and maybe adding an Infobox/table displaying the important statistics for the Economy section. The only thing I can see for the Politics section is maybe including more references and content from the original article, but that’s just my opinion. Other than that, it looks great and I’m proud to support your nomination. This is my first time in the peer-review process too, so forgive me if I did anything wrong. -User:Учхљёная (talk,philosophy,edits). 20:49, 1 April 2018 (UTC)