Wikipedia:Peer review/She Wolf/archive1

She Wolf

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it has failed GAN once and I want to make sure it doesn't happen for a second time. I think this peer review will sort out problems before it is nominated again.

Thanks, WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:13, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

I feel obligated to chip-in here - I have a few ideas.

The sentence structures in "Songs and repertoire" follow this formula, at least for the most part:

• • A song's influences
  • Lyrical content
  • Writers & producers
  • If a Spanish-language equivalent exists and was used on the album

I'd like to suggest attacking each of these ideas in separate paragraphs. For example, "The songs on the album were largely influenced by [genres]," listing and describing the influential genres from most-influential to least.

Then, summarize the album's lyrical content, grouping similarly-themed songs together and describing them in brief sentence clauses.

Finally, the last paragraph can denote whether Spanish-language versions exist and where they were used.

I'd recommend against reiterating who wrote or produced what unless it proves particularly vital to the nature of the song; for example, if a producer stated during an interview what kind of vibes they were going for and said something creative, it might be worth quoting that, but again avoid the songwriters & producers for the most part as they're already listed a few sections below with the track listing. LazyBastardGuy 06:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

This issue has been addressed after your GA review. Please take a look. --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:29, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Very well done! It's much easier to read now. Sorry if I was beating a dead horse here, I hadn't thought to check the article before posting here. LazyBastardGuy 18:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! Are there any other problems with the article? --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 10:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)