Wikipedia:Peer review/Romania/archive1

Romania edit

I've listed this article for peer review because I believe it offers good information but I am not sure weather it is good enough to obtain an FA status. Please offer any suggestions, especially about fluidity.


Thanks,

Nergaal 23:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

DONE Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally do not start with articles ('the', 'a(n)'). For example, if there was a section called ==The Biography==, it should be changed to ==Biography==.[?]

DONE Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.[?]

DONE Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[?]

  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honor (A) (British: honour), harbor (A) (British: harbour), metre (B) (American: meter), defence (B) (American: defense), recognize (A) (British: recognise), colonize (A) (British: colonise), ization (A) (British: isation), isation (B) (American: ization), analyse (B) (American: analyze).

DONE The script has spotted the following contractions: didn't, if these are outside of quotations, they should be expanded.

  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, DTGardner 22:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]