Wikipedia:Peer review/Rayquaza/archive1

Rayquaza edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

(Putting this in Arts felt a bit pretentious)

I've listed this article for peer review because I recently gave it substantial content (esp. re: Mega Rayquaza and the Trading Card Game) as well as copyediting help, and think its current C-Class rating is now outdated. I would like to know how it could be further improved, where it lies on the Article Quality scale, and what (if anything) should be done to progress it to Good Article candidacy.

Thanks! TheTiksiBranch (talk) 03:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, TheTiksiBranch, I'd say you have to add sources for the parts that are not covered by them. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 22:48, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]