Wikipedia:Peer review/Project Gutenberg/archive1
This article on the 36-year old Project Gutenberg digital library is in decent shape, but I'd like to find out if there are any suggestions for improvement. It does need some additional references. Thanks. — RJH (talk) 17:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:37, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- There should be more on the evolving "place" and role of Project Gutenberg as many other digital libraries have emerged in recent years. Is it still predominant among them? Has its role shifted, or specialized? Also, given the type of project that PG is, we should more academic-type sources from university and library (as in brick library) publications.--Pharos 02:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)