Wikipedia:Peer review/Polanyi’s paradox/archive1

Polanyi’s paradox edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed my article on Polanyi's paradox for peer review because I want to expand my discussion further. Could you please give me some suggestions?

Thanks, Handslv (talk) 10:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Handslv: I made several copy edits, mostly concerning formatting. Sometimes I need to review the WP:MOS, and maybe this would also be helpful to you. I would suggest trying for cleaner copy before submitting an article for peer review. This is an interesting article and most of the article seems to be appropriately sourced, though it could be improved by replacing edits sourced by primary sources with reliable secondary sources. Several times the article used Polanyi's work as a source, which in this context, would be a primary source. So these parts of the article appear to be original research, even if they are correct descriptions. It also looks like OR in the description of Gilbert Ryle, for example. As you work on expanding the article, please consider addressing these other issues. Cheers, Oldsanfelipe (talk) 10:02, 31 October 2018 (UTC) edited once by Oldsanfelipe (talk) 10:05, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]