Wikipedia:Peer review/Phonk/archive1

Phonk edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I'm looking to see if this article can be improved any further, as I think it's as exhaustive as it gets. Also, I'm curious if an article of this size could be nominated for GA. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:11, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720 edit

Hi Nehme1499 I am sorry that it has taken so long for someone to reivew this. Unfortunately, I don't think this is ready for GAN yet. I think more information needs to be added to the article to expand its scope. Try looking for more sources at WP:LIBRARY, Google Scholar, and using the academic databases provided by your local library system. Also, medium and soundcloud are not considered reliable sources so these need to be replaced. Please let me know if you have any questions. Z1720 (talk) 14:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: Thanks for your reply. Given the very recent nature of the musical genre, it's not something that we can source through academic papers. Also, why are SoundCloud's yearly reviews not reliable? And what do you mean by "medium"? Nehme₁₄₉₉ 16:27, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Soundcloud sources are to blogs, and it is unknown who the author is. This makes the sources dubious and is sometimes considered unreliable. Ref 3 is to medium.com, which per WP:MEDIUM is not considered reliable. I did a quick search for "phonk" in JSTOR and found some sources that might be promising. Keep looking for more sources that talk about this subject as you never know where you will find reliable sources. Z1720 (talk) 16:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: The author to the SoundCloud sources is Soundcloud itself (author). I've replaced the medium source with another one. Thanks for your suggestion with JSTOR: I'll try looking for other sources. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 16:53, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Nehme1499: were you successful in finding new sources? Are you ready for another review, or should we close this PR? Z1720 (talk) 15:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: No, not really. Given that the genre is pretty new, I think we just need more time for sources to pop up. The PR can be closed, thanks for your help. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 15:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]