Wikipedia:Peer review/Neuroscience/archive2

Neuroscience edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because… nomination for either ga or fa

Thanks, RJJ4y7 (talk) 19:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from user:scope_creep edit

@RJJ4y7: I would update the article with more references first before you resubmit it for review. There are three sections which needs references. They need to be updated with references. There is at least 1 citation needed template that needs a ref. In the History section, the last big paragraph has no references. The Modern neuroscience section, there is 1 references for three paragraphs. It needs more. The last big paragraph there needs references. Also Ref 48 Shah, S.; Liu, Y.; Hu, W.; Gao, J. (2011). "Modeling Particle Shape-Dependent Dynamics in Nanomedicine". Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology is unsuitable. It is a predatory journal and is non-RS. Please remove it. I would put references and then resubmit. At the moment it wouldn't even be considered for GA as its not referenced correctly.

I hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 12:55, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]