Netscape edit
I have proposed that Netscape Communications Corporation and Netscape (web browser) be merged into the main Netscape article. The Netscape article will then focus on the ex-corporation, as well as the browsers it used to make.
The Netscape and Netscape Communications Corporation articles are rich in information. If the articles are merged, I think the new Netscape article will be close to Good Article standards. However, I anticipate that after the merger, the information may be badly organized. Hence the Peer Review.
The Peer Review is intended to help me collaborate with other editors to facilitate the process of merger, the re-organization of information after the merger, the addressing of any other problems spotted and the proccess of making Netscape a Good Article.
One thing I observed about both articles is that the History sections take up almost the entire article. However, I am not sure whether this is a problem. This is because Netscape as a corporation no longer exists, and there is very little to write about the current state of the Netscape browser. In addition, the History section covers the information well. We may need to create some new sections to hold information which should not belong in the History aection.
I noticed the lack of references in the Netscape article. The Netscape Communications Corporation article has 12 references. After the articles are merged, perhaps we could find more references for the merged article.
Compare with Yahoo!, which I am also Peer Reviewing.
--J.L.W.S. The Special One 11:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- I suggest completing the merger; doing what you can to bring the resulting article up to "good" status, then undergoing a peer review. As it stands right now I'm not clear what good a peer review of a projected article would serve. The introduction to thie peer review page lists several resources for pages that are in need of improvement. Thanks. — RJH (talk) 15:45, 21 June 2006 (UTC)