Mini edit
This article looks good and is stable, it's the correct length and the team of people who work on it regularly seem pretty happy with it. I think it's ready for Featured Article - but we need more eyes on the page. Thanks in advance! SteveBaker 20:40, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- A couple of small things, could the lead be expanded to create a brief overview of the article per WP:LEAD? Also, the external links under the footnotes section should be cited correctly according to WP:CITE. AndyZ 23:19, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable. I've expanded the two paragraphs in the overview - I'm off to learn about WP:CITE. SteveBaker 02:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
- The layout is top-notch! I'd support now, but to be constructive - the intro is a bit ropey, I'll edit now, revert if you don't like! --PopUpPirate 00:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- That's a great change. Sometimes you get so close to the words what with fact checking and aiming for consistancy of 'tone' and all that - so you can't see elegant simplifications like that. This is what Peer review is best at! Mini-thanks. :-) SteveBaker 01:59, 2 March 2006 (UTC)