Wikipedia:Peer review/Mexico City Metropolitan Cathedral/archive2

Mexico City Metropolitan Cathedral edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for December 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I've spent quite a bit of time cleaning up this article and I'd like to get it to featured article status. I would like a few more pairs of eyes to take a look and give me opinions in specific things such as the prose, are there any glaring omissions, check the copy etc.

Thanks, LinguistAtLarge 23:42, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note. I've gone over the previous peer review and implemented everything mentioned there. Thanks! LinguistAtLarge 23:45, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please create all red links immediately. Very distracting.

Yes, I'm working on that. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 20:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why are external links not present.

I haven't found any relevant, external links that meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. When some are found, I have no problem with an external links section. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 20:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the Lead, (Spanish: Catedral Metropolitana). Here, Spanish need not be italicized. Italics should be minimized as far as possible.

This has been taken care of (Thanks). LinguistAtLarge • Msg 20:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LEAD, 1st para, last line..Countries like Spain need not be wikilinked. They are very popular. Check throughout the article for such common word linking

I think it is beneficial to link the first instance of things like this, because they are very important to the article. As a reader, it's easier to click the link than type "spain" into the search box. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 20:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, I have removed the link while reworking the lead. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 20:50, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is situated on the northern side of Mexico City's Zócalo atop the former Aztec sacred precinct and temple to Huitzilopochtli
- Can you provide some context for Zócalo like is it a suburb, hill, neighbourhood etc..Kensplanet ^T _C 05:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to give some more context to this-- the Zócalo is the central plaza in downtown Mexico City. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 20:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In the second Paragraph, I find a lot of Numbers. Can you reduce some and mention the most significant ones. Kensplanet^T _C 05:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will work on this. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 20:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done LinguistAtLarge • Msg 21:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

REF2 (http://es.encarta.msn.com/encnet/error/Error.aspx?mesgid=500-7&url=http%3a%2f%2fes.encarta.msn.com%2fencnet%2frefpages%2fRefArticle.aspx%3frefid%3d761586713) is a deadlink. Anyway is MSN reliable?
Are U sure REF1 (http://www.sacred-destinations.com/mexico/mexico-city-cathedral.htm) is areliable site? (Do ANswer this here) Kensplanet^T _C 05:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into these references. The first one is Encarta, Microsoft's encyclopedia software, not just MSN. I'll have to see if there is an updated link to the article. The second one may not be a reliable source. I'll look at it. I didn't add that reference, but I do think all the info there checks out. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 23:54, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want the best review of the article, then may I suggest a review of History of Mumbai which I have nominated at Wikipedia:Peer review/History of Mumbai/archive2 Kensplanet^T _C 17:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done :) LinguistAtLarge • Msg 23:54, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]