Wikipedia:Peer review/Mesh analysis/archive1

Mesh analysis edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because the author wishes feedback on how to improve the article.

Thanks, Tim Vickers (talk) 16:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)

Don't put spaces between punctuation and citations per WP:CITE (e.g. [1]).
Don't overcapitalise the headings per WP:HEAD (so "Mesh Currents and Essential Meshes" should be "Mesh currents and essential meshes"). This should be reflected in the captions.
Explain the abbreviations in the captions, R1, Vs etc.
What's a "planar circuit"?
Explain the currents i1 etc in figure 2.
I think the lead needs to be expanded to clarify what the article is about for non-experts.

Hope that helps. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]