Medzhybizh edit
This article has been greatly expanded today and I am thinking of nominating it for FA. I think a general review would be helpful.--Natl1 14:54, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- A great deal of work will be needed before it is close to WP:WIAFA. It needs citing (see WP:CITE), the WP:LEAD needs work, and the section headings don't conform to WP:MOS and WP:MSH. It doesn't conform with WP:GTL. Sandy (Talk) 19:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- First up - a bigger lead with 2 paragraphs which summarise important points. Then as above..Cas Liber 04:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)