I've listed this article for peer review because I have added, removed and changed information that has made the article appear more presentable for readers wanting knowledge on this topic. Every award section is correctly formatted, cited and explicitly defined. The introduction gives a substantial amount of information as well. I hope to gain any feedback from this Peer review and help determine a consensus on whether or not this article fits the guidelines for a Featured list candidate.
Thanks, De88 (talk) 00:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
