- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for April 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to see how the article rates. I know it's purty good in terms of references, but I'll take any (other) suggestions.
Thanks, Drmies (talk) 22:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
- Note: I'm working on adding all the Billboard listings I can find (which is a hell of a job!). Is that worth it for a classical contemporary group? I don't think I can do the same for charts outside the US (it's 39 studio albums, plus soundtracks, etc.), but I'd hate to be US-centric. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 05:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comments by Cannibaloki (talk · contribs)
- Title
- release date → Released
- catalog info → Label(s)
- Format(s)
- Notes
Billboard top rank, # of weeks in chart; This column must be removed, because you should write only about their best positions (merged to notes column), giving emphasis to the number of weeks (when are of long duration). See also WP:CHART.- Examples of catalog numbers:
- Landmark Records LLP-1505 → Landmark (#1505)
- Nonesuch 79372 → Nonesuch (#79372)
- In most cases, a comma is better than a slash.
- 15 Aug 1986 → 15 August 1986 (You may find help in MOS:DATE)
- song title → Song(s)
- artist name → Artist (I know you are referring to a name)
Doing... Cannibaloki 19:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- The sections should follow the same order as the infobox.
- Studio albums
- Compilation albums
- Video albums
- Soundtracks
- Contributions
- In the section contributions, merge the sub-sections into one. Cannibaloki 19:39, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- What do you think now? I think I covered all your points--though I see now that I have yet to add the number of weeks on the charts for some of the more popular ones. I'll get on that later. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 22:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, looks good. Cannibaloki 22:53, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hey Loki, I've added the weeks on the chart for selected entries. I think I've done about all I could do--what's the next step? (The one thing I can't do is get a nicer picture of the group.) BTW, you should listen to their version of "Purple Haze"--it'll blow you away. ;) Drmies (talk) 03:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Remove the word "Records" (Label(s) column), to avoid redundancies.
- Expand the lead section
- See WP:SLASH
- For release dates, use Template:Nowrap Cannibaloki 04:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hey Loki, I've added the weeks on the chart for selected entries. I think I've done about all I could do--what's the next step? (The one thing I can't do is get a nicer picture of the group.) BTW, you should listen to their version of "Purple Haze"--it'll blow you away. ;) Drmies (talk) 03:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, looks good. Cannibaloki 22:53, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
- Done! I did expand the lead and hope you like it. Drmies (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Cool, this was all that I could do to help you. How much more reviewers see your work, better it will be (regarding the possibility of ideas). Cannibaloki 22:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Great. I could never have done this without you. So, what happens next? You said FL candidacy, were you serious? (That's higher than I've ever even aimed at WP.) Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, now you known what should do, right? Cannibaloki 23:50, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Great. I could never have done this without you. So, what happens next? You said FL candidacy, were you serious? (That's higher than I've ever even aimed at WP.) Thanks, Drmies (talk) 23:10, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Cool, this was all that I could do to help you. How much more reviewers see your work, better it will be (regarding the possibility of ideas). Cannibaloki 22:57, 7 April 2009 (UTC)