Kingdom Hearts III edit
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I am aiming to clean it up. I remember that when it was created, it was updated with references every announcement but it got way too much. I basically rewrote most of the reception to fit the more modern way of writing video game reception section similar to the article Final Fantasy XV although I think the only one I edited more was the remake of FFVII. I'm kinda confused about the casting section and characters since some might come across as minor stuff.
Thanks, Tintor2 (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Comments from Cat's Tuxedo edit
@Tintor2: Coming across the reception section, I'm noticing a distinct lack of commentary on the game's visuals and audio. For coverage on critical analysis to be considered adequately broad, it should at the very least cover the game's three most major aspects: gameplay, visuals, and audio. Since such a task can be daunting when a major and contemporary triple-A release such as this is involved, keeping a sandbox or personal text document on the side will come in handy for keeping all the critics' individual points for each aspect sorted out. And if a more particular aspect of a game (like a gameplay mechanic or the narrative's writing) calls for its own paragraph, by all means don't be shy about it. Just to give you an idea of what to go for (especially if you're aiming for GA), here's some decent examples: 1, 2, 3 Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 21:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)