Keating! edit
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I've been working to expand and improve it and am really interested in getting some feedback, particularly as this is the first time I've really edited a musical theatre/music-related article and I'm a little unsure.
Thanks, Shoemoney2night (talk) 08:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement. If you want more comments, please ask here.
- Should there be some sort of dab statement at the top on the politician and other uses of the word Keating?
- A model article is useful for ideas and examples to follow - one FA that may be a good model is A Very Merry Unauthorized Children's Scientology Pageant, a musical too
- The article has no reception section - separate material on what critics thought, etc.
- The plot section seems overly detailed to me, and has no refs. I am not sure if plot needs refs or not, but the model article has them (see above)
- I like the four fair use pictures and two fair use sound clips, but do six fair use media files meet WP:NFCC? I am not an expert, but this issue may arise at GAN/FAC.
- Second paragraph of Music has no refs.
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:44, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for the review, this is really helpful! I'm working on addressing these now. Cheers, -Shoemoney2night (talk) 04:28, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
- You are welcome - the images should follow WP:MOS#Images, so images on the left inder headers are discouraged. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 04:48, 17 October 2008 (UTC)