| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
I've been editing a number of pages recently, adding the Authority Control template, and missing LCCNs and VIAF numbers, and adding the 'DNB Poster' to the articles where it applies, but this is the first of several dozen where I've done all of several things. I'm just hoping for some quick 'Wikipedia Style Guide' type feedback that what I'm doing is correct, esp. as far as changing the way the references are done. From what I can tell, like this is 'current practice', but there seem to be leftover bits of other ways of doing it.
Thanks, Revent (talk) 23:06, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Comment: Nice job so far, but the page needs a good deal of work with standardization and uniformity. I'd suggest comparing it to similar topics of articles from WP:Featured articles. Instructive pages that might be helpful for you to review include: WP:CITE, WP:CIT, WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:Article development. — Cirt (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2013 (UTC)