Wikipedia:Peer review/Job analysis/archive1

Job analysis

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I am working on this page for a psychology class at Ball State University. We are trying to improve the Industrial/Organizational Psychology-related articles on Wikipedia. For most of us, this is our first time editing articles on Wikipedia. I am hoping that someone will be able to review this article and let us know if we are on the right track, or what information needs to be added/changed.

Thanks, Mnshumate (talk) 00:53, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments

• The lead is way too short, a couple of brief paragraphs are needed for an article of this size which summarise the topic under discussion.
• "Industrial/Organizational Psychology" no need for all those capital letters, these aren't proper nouns.
• "to prepare job description and job specification " either "to prepare job descriptions and specifications" or "to prepare a job description and a job specification"
• "workforce into the organization" into "an" organization. Remember, this is an enyclopedia article, not a "how-to" guide.
• "definition of a job domain; describing a..." be consistent. Either "definition..; description of..." or "defining ....; describing..."
• Human Resources -> human resources.
• Industrial Psychology -> ditto.
• You link "task analysis" on the second time round. Usually we link things on their first use.
• "and/or compensation. [2]" no spaces between punctuation and reference.
• "conducted: task-oriented or worker-oriented." no need for the bold.
• Task-Oriented etc -> Task-oriented.
• Avoid more upper case stuff like Functional Job Analysis...
• (0-6) -> use an en-dash (per WP:DASH) here so (0–6).
• "The Dictionary of Occupational Titles " is not linked first time either, so make sure it is!
• Needs more references for the "Procedures" section.
• "(an online resource which has replaced the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT)" missing a closing parenthesis.
• Refs need titles, accessdates, publication dates, publishers, authors, etc where possible.
• You have a duff "interwiki" link, see [[nl:Arbeidsanalyse.
• Other Sources -> Other sources.

The Rambling Man (talk) 13:58, 11 April 2012 (UTC)