Wikipedia:Peer review/James Stewart (actor)/archive1

I've been gathering sources and working on this article for about a month, and would greatly appreciate criticism, comments, and contributions. Thank you. Volatile 21:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ah, what a great actor he really was. The article is also great, as it should be. Good work! But i think footnotes (see Wikipedia:Footnotes) would be a nice addition to cite several parts of the article, and also more References or further reading. Is there any reason for the coloring in the 'Awards' table? Looking pretty good, has potential as a featured article candidate. — Wackymacs 21:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent job on James Stewart. As mentioned above, footnotes adds a lot to a page. It's one of my favorites as far as actor pages go. Have you ever read the Henry Fonda page? Keep up the great work!Steve-O 21:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comments, Wackymacs and Steve. I'll see what I can do about footnotes and references. The coloring of the Awards table is more for aesthetic reasons. I also used it for the Henry Fonda page. I don't think there is an accepted three-toned (for three-tiers: Award, won/nominated, and film/award title) table. Volatile 22:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]