Wikipedia:Peer review/History of the New York Giants/archive1

Part of a New York Giants History series I started, this is a GA and I'm going to submit it for FAC soon thought I'd get a peer review first. Quadzilla99 01:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No arguments from me, and nothing that stands out on first glance. Good luck!-- Zleitzen(talk) 15:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Quadzilla99 16:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated

edit
Since there were no editor responses I generated an automated peer review. Quadzilla99 15:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

Done, there was one that wasn't linked, it was in a quote. Quadzilla99 15:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
They do. Quadzilla99 15:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
None exist. Quadzilla99 15:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
They're all linked, see above. Quadzilla99 15:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.[?]
It's already been through summary style extensively. Quadzilla99 15:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
    • many people sa
    • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).[?]
All cited. Quadzilla99 16:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): Doesn't, Hasn't.
All in quotations. Quadzilla99 15:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.