Wikipedia:Peer review/History of the New York Giants/archive1

History of the New York Giants

Part of a New York Giants History series I started, this is a GA and I'm going to submit it for FAC soon thought I'd get a peer review first. Quadzilla99 01:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

No arguments from me, and nothing that stands out on first glance. Good luck!-- Zleitzen^(talk) 15:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Quadzilla99 16:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Automated

Since there were no editor responses I generated an automated peer review. Quadzilla99 15:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.^[?]

Done, there was one that wasn't linked, it was in a quote. Quadzilla99 15:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

• Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.^[?]

They do. Quadzilla99 15:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

• There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.^[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)

None exist. Quadzilla99 15:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.^[?]

They're all linked, see above. Quadzilla99 15:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

• Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.^[?]

It's already been through summary style extensively. Quadzilla99 15:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

• There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.
  • many people sa
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).^[?]

All cited. Quadzilla99 16:57, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

• Avoid using contractions like (outside of quotations): Doesn't, Hasn't.

All in quotations. Quadzilla99 15:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.^[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.

• Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 03:44, 4 May 2007 (UTC) Whoops - just saw you already ran the script, oh well...