Wikipedia:Peer review/Glasnost Meeting/archive1

This peer review discussion has been closed.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like someone to go over the language of the article (I'm not a native speaker). Also, I would like feedback on whether the citations are enough. Another question would be whether to capitalize both words of the title.

Thanks, Nkrita (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article is in very good shape. I didn't see any problems with the language, but I might look to add in some more refs. I think the title is good as it is.—Zujine|talk 15:21, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking it over. I will add some more references. As for the title -- research literature usually refers to it as "glasnost meeting" (no capital letters and in quotes). For now I'll just create a few redirects. Nkrita (talk) 17:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]