England edit
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for July 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because, I've put a lot of work into it in my note pad over the last five months and would like to know what needs to be done to get it up to GA status.
Thanks, Yorkshirian (talk) 01:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Some comments from Nikkimaria
I have a few short suggestions for improvement. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- I would suggest moving "Demography" to right after "Geography"
Done - I've usually seen "Economy" as a separate section from "Infrastructure" Done
- Make sure each paragraph has at least one citation, if not more Done
- Make sure that all units have conversions - use the convert template Done
- Be consistent in whether you use %, percent or per cent Done
- Look at WP:HYPHEN - you're missing hyphens in some places Done
- The pictures don't always match up to the text. For example, there are pictures of Boudica and Stonehenge in the history section, but neither are mentioned in the text Done
- The subdivisions picture is incorrectly named Done
- On the "language" image, you might consider explaining what the colours mean Done
Deserves GA status