Wikipedia:Peer review/Elisabeth Sladen/archive1

Elisabeth Sladen edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I feel it could do with input from the community.

Thanks, Kelvin 101 (talk) 18:54, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from LT910001 edit

Thanks for your edits to this article! It's very well-reading and thorough. I really like some aspects of the article, including the way it's written, and its comprehensiveness. I think it could however improve in some aspects:

Could write about the roles in a more discursive way, so that it doesn't feel as much like a list.
The unreferenced sections need citations.

Overall I think this article is of good quality, with the first two points addressed I'd encourage you to nominate it for good article status, and undergo a more thorough review there. I hope this helps! Kind regards, LT910001 (talk) 01:34, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]