| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because it was previously a good article in 2006 but has since then it has fell into disrepair. I am not sure where to start, hoping for some advise assuming it's salvageable. Additionally I have created a sandbox so you may comment on specific sections.
User:Kelvin 101/EastEnders (Main article draft)
Thanks, Kelvin 101 (talk) 22:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Just some general issues, I will add more as I find them. Tsange ☯ Talk 17:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Images need ALT text
- Multiple dead links see [1]
- History section should come before Setting section
- Not really sure the Realism section adds anything to the article.
- Character section is too long
- More of the article consists of
- Lots of choppy sentences that are short and don't flow well into each other
Comments by Smurrayinchester Smurrayinchester 18:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
- A couple of sections are out of date - the budgets only run to 2010, for instance, and the number of episodes per year is as of 2006.
- The "Internet" section should probably go - very out of date, and it's no longer especially interesting that people search for TV shows.
- The "Criticism" section should be split up - maybe something like "Allegations of national and racial stereotypes", "Morality and violence", "Controversial storylines" - and be trimmed a bit. (As the most viewed show in the UK, there will always be some complaints. Priority should be given to the biggest ones.
- The "Realism" section seems mistitled - "Issues" might be more accurate.
- I'd expand the "In popular culture" section to "In British culture", since it currently contains nothing but a link to EastEnders in popular culture. Academics have written reams about what EastEnders means to British culture (see 1, 2, 3).
- Thanks for both of your comments I shall try and rectify all problems as soon as possible. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 14:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)