Wikipedia:Peer review/Democratic peace theory/archive3
Democratic peace theory edit
This controversial theory has caused a long conflict. Peer-review has been suggested as part of dispute resolution.Ultramarine 12:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Ultramarine has jusat added in the text of a deleted article, a lengthy polemic in favor of the extreme view that two democracies have never ever fought a war.
- First deletion discussion:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Why_Rummel_is_always_right
- Full disclosure: The first deletion discussion was at a name I moved it to; I opposed deletion then, and wanted a name I could remember. Another name might have been better, but this one does describe all three versions of the article.
- Second deletion discussion:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democratic peace theory (Specific_historic_examples)
- Third deletion discussion:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Possible wars between liberal democracies
- First deletion discussion:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Why_Rummel_is_always_right
- Septentrionalis 16:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- It was the deleting administrator who suggested that the contents should be added to the Democratic peace theory article and that it should be listed for peer review to help dispute resolution: [1] Ultramarine 16:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- I trust peer review will find any shreds of worthwhile material in this advocacy of an extreme and minority position. Septentrionalis 01:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- It was the deleting administrator who suggested that the contents should be added to the Democratic peace theory article and that it should be listed for peer review to help dispute resolution: [1] Ultramarine 16:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)