Wikipedia:Peer review/Days of our Lives/archive2

Days of our Lives edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to make it better. I want to hear criticism from other users, I want to change things to make them better. If the article needs more work I would like to know. I would like to get it up to featured article status. All comments are welcome. I am willing to put as much time, and effort needed.

Thanks, Sami50421 (talk) 22:13, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brianboulton comments: I haven't got to the prose yet, but here are some issues relating to images and sources:-

Images
- The rationale for the use of Image:Hortongroup.jpg‎ is very weak and needs to be amplified, to explain why the image materially assists the readers' understanding of the article.
- Image:Dayshourglass1966.jpg: There may be some difficulty in justifying the use of this under a non-free rationale.
Sources
- Formatting: As a minimum, online references need to show a title, a publisher and an access date. Some of yours lack one or more of these. For example, refs 1, 46 and 57 lack publisher information. 46 and 57 also lack retrieval date. Ref 10 is a bare url. Check carefully, to ensure that all references are properly formatted.
- Consistency: you have "Time", "TIME" and "TIME magazine"
- Italics: The titles of journals and newspapers should be italicised. The names of non-print sources shouls not be italicised.
- Reliability: I have not checked many of these, but I am dubious the reliability of some. For example, ref 1 - why is this a reliable source?

Brianboulton (talk) 23:54, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know when you have responded to above, and I'll continue the review. Brianboulton (talk) 10:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]