Wikipedia:Peer review/Controversies about the Boy Scouts of America/archive1

Controversies about the Boy Scouts of America edit

Thorough and well-documented article. So... how could it be better? -Alecmconroy 00:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well written, indeed...you could fix the red links- Osbus 03:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I hadn't anticipated a lack of negative comments. Should we send this over to FAC do ya think? -Alecmconroy 21:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A small point, but why isn't the TOC the standard numbered list as on virtually every Wikipedia article? It should be on there, just because following the norm on this would avoid a minor storm in a teacup on FAC. Thanks. Harr o5 04:36, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent point-- I made the change.-Alecmconroy 05:00, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]