Cold Feet (series 1) edit
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'm looking for feedback on this article ahead of a potential FA run. Language and prose suggestions mostly but any other comments are welcome. Bradley0110 (talk) 12:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments: Interesting article on a show I have not seen. Here are some suggestions for improvement:\
- A model article is often useful for ideas to follow - I note that Smallville (season 1) is a FA and may be a useful model.
- The lead needs to summarize the whole article - My rule of thumb is to include every header in the lead in some way, but the video and internet release are not mentioned. See WP:LEAD
- I also think the lead should be written with the most important things about the series in the first paragraph, but we really don't get a summary The overall theme of the first series is love, sex and commitment. until the second paragraph.
- The lead should be weighted about the same as the article - I am OK with the six lead actors, but do we need all the guest stars listed?
- Looking at the Smallville (another show I have never seen) article as a model, it tells us the main roles in the lead, so the plot summaries make more sense. WHen I read this, I have no idea who Jenny and Pete and the rest are. Would it be possible to have some sort of brief summary in the lead or just before the epsidoe list that says something like "The series focuses on three couples: Jenny and Pete, who are married and about to have their first child; Karen and David, ... and Adam and Rachel, ... Provide context for the reader WP:PCR
- I realize the six main cast members were cast for the pilot, but could there be a bit more on them in Casting? It seems odd to have almost nothing on the six main actors and lots of detail on supporting cast.
- In Writing the caption on the block quote needs to be clearer - I think this is from the script as originally written, but that is not made clear. I also think the caption does not match up with the text - I read the caption first and had a very different idea of what it meant than the text said.
- I would mention the car crashing through the shop window in the Episode 3 plot summary, otherwise the image makes less sense. Perhaps also mention in the caption.
- Refs look OK, although I am not sure what makes for reliable sources such as Red Dwarf.co.uk. and Sendit.com here - see WP:RS
Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 15:55, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments. I've started on some of the minor points you've raised and will tackle the major points over the weekend. Bradley0110 (talk) 16:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Response to Ruhrfisch Okey-dokey, I've made several changes based on your comments. Funny you should recommend using the Smallville article as a model, as I basically just stole the layout of that and changed the colours and names.
- I've expanded the lead to include who the characters are (a bit of a daft omission) and written a little bit about what the characters do to complement the overall theme. I've also added info about the DVD and net releases, as well as a couple more notable award noms.
- I've not added anything on the casting of the leads as it seems strange to include info from a separate production. However, I have added a link to the casting section in the pilot article.
- Captions fixed up and plot summaries expanded to include info and context for later on.
- Refs check out: The Red Dwarf link is an interview with Bathurst. The website is the show's official website and is run by the same person who compiles the behind-the-scenes documentaries for the Red Dwarf DVDs. As for Sendit, they're an internet shop, so their data for DVD/video release dates will be accurate. They're quite well known for having an archive of--it seems--every release date of any video or DVD ever released.
Bradley0110 (talk) 09:52, 24 May 2008 (UTC)