Chris Dodd presidential campaign, 2008 edit

I've listed this article for peer review because I think the content is pretty good, but I am not sure that the format works. I have had some discussions with one of the major editors about the issue, and I think that article could benefit from some peer review, especially now that his campaign has ended.

The article uses a different frame of reference than the sister articles on Hillary and Obama. I think the focus strays too far into the main developments of the race, which would be covered under the main election article. Also, I think there are too many photos that are tangential (at best) to the main issue. For example, there are some stock photos of the other candidates, a stock photo of a fireman, and Steve Martin in 1982.

Thanks,

RedShiftPA (talk) 03:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 06:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]