Wikipedia:Peer review/Camouflage/archive1

Camouflage

Would like comments as to what external views are about the balance of the article (natural vs. military, theory, external links) and stylish concerns (level of detail right?). Is this article close to FA level ? novacatz 03:31, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Close but still lots of stuff to be done:

1. Lead size is inadequate: Please expand to 250-300 words
2. Images are poorly placed. Please test them on 800x600 resolution.
3. Mil vs Natural is unbalanced. Consider summarising the mil topics, and moving detail to a separate page.
4. Topic outlines mostly western countries. What about other countries?
5. Camouflage in snow?
6. William MacKay... Naval Consulting Board of which country?
7. Bill Jordan??
8. I think invisibility should be under a separate heading.
9. Predator is a Hollywood movie. Mention that
10. See alsos should be pruned
11. Sections 2.1 and 4.1 are unnecessary. Min 2 subsections are needed to merit the use of a subheading.
12. =People who served as camouflage experts= is a subjective list. Please remove.
13. Something can be mentioned on the LTTE's striped camouflage?
14. What's the origin to the word camouflage?

=Nichalp «Talk»= 09:27, 24 December 2005 (UTC)