Wikipedia:Peer review/Born This Way/archive2

Born This Way edit

Previous peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
This article has gone through a major restructuring and despited improving significantly, there are still some issues that would limit this article from becoming a GA article and/or a FAC. I'd like to know some improvements that can be made, and some assistance with a thorough copy-edit would be much appreciated.

Thanks, DAP388 (talk) 01:09, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARTICLESIZE. This is passing the threshold level of being an encyclopedic article, and over to fandom fanpedia. — Legolas (talk2me) 06:10, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely needs trimming; especially the Singles section. The references are a mess and the overall content is too confusing to even comprehend. (cough *artwork reveal date*) —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 10:06, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Trimmed a lot of the extra stuff out of the article, particularly in the Singles and Promotion sections. Will probably start on the intro and the references tomorrow. — DAP388 (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No DAP, it still goes into unnecessary details, especially in the composition and themes. The article is 145KB in size, that's greater than even freaking FA bios! This needs a drastic reduction to 75–80 KB. I will see what I can do. — Legolas (talk2me) 03:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
LOL, this is starting to get frustrating and tedious. I feel like I'm doing the best I can do. Help would be much appreciated! — DAP388 (talk) 05:38, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also, trimming it down to 75–80 KB seems like a bit of a stretch. Unless it drastically shrinks via references, then you'd be cutting out a lot of info in regards to the album. — DAP388 (talk) 16:56, 1 October 2011
Yes, I think the article should be trimmed. The composition section, however, is only very long because there are 17 songs on the album (including the three bonus tracks). I'll do what I can to help trim it down.--&レア (talk) 14:21, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]