Wikipedia:Peer review/AC/DC/archive1

AC/DC edit

This article reached the GA status about a month ago and now I'd like to know how it could be improved. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks. No-Bullet 20:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Upon reading the Article, this is what I found that should be changed:

Per WP:DATE the only time a date should be hyperlinked is if it is one of significant importance, or if the full date is used

Done. No-Bullet 04:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2 of the smallest sections are influences and discography, the Influences should talk about who influenced them, and possibly who they influenced. In a Band article, the influence section should be one of the biggest sections. see Pink Floyd for an example of this. The discography should have the album covers for all major albums, as for what qualifies major is up to you.

Added covers to the discography section. I didn't find an influence section on Pink Floyd, but I'll try to expand it. No-Bullet 04:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Consider copyediting the article. I diddn't look for spelling or grammar, but a copy edit is a good thing to do.
Consider expanding the history section into it's own article with a good couple of paragraphs that gives the reader a good understanding of the general history.
Some things to reference:

From Early years "...was sacked after passing out on stage (reportedly because someone spiked his drink)..."
From Continued Success "It was their sixth album, Highway To Hell...that propelled them into the top ranks of hard rock acts..."

Hope I could help, Wikipedia's False Prophet holla at me Improve Me 00:28, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Ruhrfisch 02:52, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) No-Bullet 01:40, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All direct quotations from any bandmembers need inline citations.

Done. No-Bullet 02:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any observations on the band's success/lack of, their legacy etc. would need inline citations also. If they weren't inline cited, this'd be accused of original research (when I believe the nominator wants this as FA). LuciferMorgan 17:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]