Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 July 3

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2008 July 3)
< July 2 July 4 >

July 3 edit

Image:01-No Clause 28 (Emilio Pasquez Space Face Full Remix).ogg edit

Image:01-No Clause 28 (Emilio Pasquez Space Face Full Remix).ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Briantist (notify | contribs).
  • per Wikipedia:Music samples, non-free music samples should always be shorter than 30 seconds and less than 10% of the length of the track. This one is 49 seconds long, more than 12% of the 395 second track ([1]). BigrTex 00:04, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, but I don't know about always. — BQZip01 — talk 05:49, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I can't think of a pressing reason to break standard music sample rules. Vickser (talk) 22:24, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:06_Straighten_It_Out.ogg edit

Image:06_Straighten_It_Out.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SoulBrotherNumberOne (notify | contribs).
  • per Wikipedia:Music samples, non-free music samples should always be shorter than 30 seconds and less than 10% of the length of the track. This one is 40 seconds long, more than 15% of the 252 second track. BigrTex 00:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, but always? — BQZip01 — talk 05:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Doesn't fit existing standards for music samples. Vickser (talk) 22:24, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Christ.jpg edit

Image:Christ.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Thelmasly (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, Absent uploader, Unencyclopedic, confusing copyright BigrTex 00:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete and protect, to generic a name anyway Fasach Nua (talk) 07:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Orphaned, no encyclopedic use. — BQZip01 — talk 05:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as orphaned and unencyclopedic. I'm also tempted to agree that the simple generic "christ.jpg" might want to be protected. Vickser (talk) 22:26, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Philippe.JPG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: not orphaned - nomination withdrawn ~ BigrTex 14:11, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Philippe.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Philippe (notify | contribs).
I'm just pointing out that it's actually linked from User:Philippe... - Philippe 04:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Mike_Chapman.jpg edit

Image:Mike_Chapman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fourdee (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, Unencyclopedic self-pic BigrTex 01:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm deleting it, this user was banned by Jimbo himself for racist edits, it seems unlikely that his block will be raised any time soon and we don't have any encyclopedic need for it. - Caribbean~H.Q. 03:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:12 Searching.ogg edit

Image:12 Searching.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SoulBrotherNumberOne (notify | contribs).
  • per Wikipedia:Music samples, non-free music samples should always be shorter than 30 seconds and less than 10% of the length of the track. This one is 35 seconds long, 14% of the 250 second track. BigrTex 01:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — talk 05:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nominator and standard music sample rules. Vickser (talk) 22:27, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Long_Tom_Hughes_2162647149_591392595b_o.jpg edit

Image:Long_Tom_Hughes_2162647149_591392595b_o.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Redvers (notify | contribs).
  • Redundant to Commons image. Kelly hi! 02:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move, so far, does not comply with the GFDL. Correct that, then it can be moved. ➨ ЯEDVEЯS used to be a sweet boy 08:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • GFDL on a public domain image? Kelly hi! 12:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    There is another image "behind" the transferred one. That image is the original. The current image is a cleaned-up version. The image being PD is irrelevant - work here is automatically GFDL-licenced and must be transferred correctly to retain the attribution. One way to do this is to transfer both images, leaving the original image "behind" the current one. Otherwise, a correct edit history is not being transferred and thus attribution is being obscured. ➨ ЯEDVEЯS used to be a sweet boy 14:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I think I see where you're coming from...what cleanup work was done, just a crop? That's generally not enough to generate a new copyright. Also, the Commons page does provide links back to the en Wikipedia revisions. Also, I don't see your "PD is irrelevant" applies - there's no attribution required for PD images, that's what public domain means. Kelly hi! 14:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    No, there's "creative input" as well. The Commons page would not provide a link back to the original image, so it wouldn't be clear what work had been done, so the attribution would be lost. And the "irrelevant" applies mostly to the edits on Wikipedia, which are not PD, but also to preserving the attribution via including both copies of the image. ➨ ЯEDVEЯS used to be a sweet boy 15:02, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    <shrug> The Commons page provides links to the original sources, at Flickr, the Library of Congress, and the English Wikipedia. I guess my impression was that whatever creative work was done was released into the public domain as well, since that is the license placed on the image. But I'll leave it up to the closing admin to decide, this seems like a nitpicky argument to me (and that's saying a lot, coming from me.) :-) Cheers - Kelly hi! 15:41, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    It is indeed a "nitpicky argument". But that's not to say it's wrong. GFDL attribution trumps all. Get that right and you can move the image. But not until. ➨ ЯEDVEЯS used to be a sweet boy 18:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    What exactly (using upload.wikimedia.org addresses) has to be moved where? What do you mean by an image "behind" another image? —Angr 20:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Compare the image A with the image B. Now compare the page C with the page D. Now find image A on page D. Not there == not GFDL compliant. IMHO, it's amazing how all these Commons "experts", so happy to harass and throw their weight around, have to be led by the nose to something so basic. ➨ ЯEDVEЯS used to be a sweet boy 07:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for the astonishing assumption of bad faith and the personal attack. Not to mention the fact that PD images really, truly DO NOT have to be GFDL-compliant and that the changes made to [2] to create [3] add no creativity and so cannot be licensed. Anyway, I've uploaded the original version of the image to Commons, it took about 10 seconds and I seriously wonder why you didn't just do it yourself. —Angr 07:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Now I see why you didn't. —Angr 07:59, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    And there we go: Commons now has a GFDL-compliant upload (it's not too much to ask, but just asking seems to offend many Commons people) and the local copy can now go. Pretty easy in the end, specious and spurious arguments apart. ➨ ЯEDVEЯS used to be a sweet boy 08:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom...if it isn't already done... — BQZip01 — talk 05:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nam Viet002.PNG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Deleted due to obvious copyright violation and/or POV pushing. Long term issue with Webster121 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). 

--seicer | talk | contribs 16:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modified map created for solely POV reason, claiming sole credit rather than crediting the original map creator. Map claims to be created by uploader but most likely was not; uploader causing great trouble by non-consensus/POV edits at Nanyue article (see edit history), for which this image was apparently produced. The original image is by Commons user: 长夜无风, who was not credited in the new upload, and the sole difference appears to be that the apparently objectionable toponyms were "yellowed out" with PhotoShop or some comparable program. Badagnani (talk) 02:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please speedy delete all these alternate photos. Barring the user's troublesome activity, he modified the work of another author without permission as well as an image from a Google search. Plus the images are rather senseless in information. .:davumaya:. 09:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Nam Viet001.png edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Deleted due to obvious copyright violation and/or POV pushing. Long term issue with Webster121 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). 

--seicer | talk | contribs 16:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modified map created for solely POV reason, claiming sole credit rather than crediting the original map creator. Map claims to be created by uploader but most likely was not; uploader causing great trouble by non-consensus/POV edits at Nanyue article (see edit history), for which this image was apparently produced. The original image is by Commons user: 长夜无风, who was not credited in the new upload, and the sole difference appears to be that the apparently objectionable toponyms were "yellowed out" with PhotoShop or some comparable program. Badagnani (talk) 00:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:NamViet100.JPG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Deleted due to obvious copyright violation and/or POV pushing. Long term issue with Webster121 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). 

--seicer | talk | contribs 16:18, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modified map created for solely POV reason, claiming sole credit rather than crediting the original map creator. Map claims to be created by uploader but most likely was not; uploader causing great trouble by non-consensus/POV edits at Nanyue article (see edit history), for which this image was apparently produced. The original image is by Thomas A. Lessman, who was not credited in the new upload, and the sole difference appears to be that the apparently objectionable toponyms were "greened out" with PhotoShop or some comparable program. Badagnani (talk) 00:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:A c8cefe7bf70706757adf65c04bb666a2.jpg edit

Image:A c8cefe7bf70706757adf65c04bb666a2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Smpictures (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned UE image. Looks like a screenshot anyway so I'm doubtful about the licensing. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A smaller version of Image:Fashion Week Eric West.jpg so still unnecessary. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Color Classic Boot.png edit

Image:Color Classic Boot.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Anabate (notify | contribs).

Image:Kibbutzmeeting.jpeg edit

Image:Kibbutzmeeting.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dinopup (notify | contribs).
  • Source information is insufficient to verify its public domain status. —Angr 16:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, but on top of that it doesn't show anything of note and adds nothing to the article. — BQZip01 — talk 06:02, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Shavuotcelebration.jpg edit

Image:Shavuotcelebration.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dinopup (notify | contribs).
  • Source website gives no year for this image. Impossible to tell if image was first published before or after January 1, 1923. —Angr 16:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Couldn't agree more. — BQZip01 — talk 06:03, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JeffersLogo.jpg edit

Image:JeffersLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JeffersPetSupply (notify | contribs).

Image:JeffersPetSupply.jpg edit

Image:JeffersPetSupply.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JeffersPetSupply (notify | contribs).

Image:JeffreyTaoUNInterpreter2a.JPG edit

Image:JeffreyTaoUNInterpreter2a.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rodsan18 (notify | contribs).

Image:Shortcircuitfilm.jpg edit

Image:Shortcircuitfilm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Edwin Larkin (notify | contribs).

Image:Jenna_jameson_046-1-.jpg edit

Image:Jenna_jameson_046-1-.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Francheech (notify | contribs).

Image:JennaBrian.JPG edit

Image:JennaBrian.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bkh147 (notify | contribs).

Image:Jennifer_Hudson1.jpg edit

Image:Jennifer_Hudson1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oscarosei (notify | contribs).

Image:Jennifer-hawkins_31167.jpg edit

Image:Jennifer-hawkins_31167.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hawko101 (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, Absent uploader, I'm betting Copyright violation also Nv8200p talk 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, but uploader's status is irrelevant. I have money on the copyvio too... — BQZip01 — talk 06:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jennifer-hawkins_31075.jpg edit

Image:Jennifer-hawkins_31075.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hawko101 (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, Au, I'm betting Copyright violation also Nv8200p talk 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom...gotta admit, at least the images up for deletion are something to look at now... — BQZip01 — talk 06:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jennifer_hawkins_15.jpg edit

Image:Jennifer_hawkins_15.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hawko101 (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, Absent uploader, Probably Copyright violation also Nv8200p talk 23:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, but uploader's status is irrelevant. — BQZip01 — talk 06:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jenny.jpg edit

Image:Jenny.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Furubalover (notify | contribs).

Image:Jenny's_pics_057sm.JPG edit

Image:Jenny's_pics_057sm.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gerardliam (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, Absent uploader, Probably Copyright violation too Nv8200p talk 23:24, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, but uploader's status is irrelevant. — BQZip01 — talk 06:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JennyEverywhere.jpg edit

Image:JennyEverywhere.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fesworks (notify | contribs).

Image:JensCute.jpg edit

Image:JensCute.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nocturneofsilence (notify | contribs).

Image:Jenpic111.jpg edit

Image:Jenpic111.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Davejonesinscotland (notify | contribs).

Image:Jeremiah_Gyang.JPG edit

Image:Jeremiah_Gyang.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Callenaudio (notify | contribs).
  • Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader Nv8200p talk 23:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Orphaned, could be used on user page, uploader's status is irrelevant. — BQZip01 — talk 06:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jeremy_Beadle_drawing.jpg edit

Image:Jeremy_Beadle_drawing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Calliopejen1 (notify | contribs).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2008_July_3&oldid=1140157096"