Vickser

Thanks!

Thank you for providing the Curriculum vitae on my friend Kaye. It really helped the case, and the article can only prosper now! Much appreciated, and happy editing, Leonard^(Bloom) 19:49, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

GOOD Magazine

I've copied your comments on my talk page to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GOOD Magazine (2nd nomination). Thanks for finding these references. -- The Anome (talk) 08:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Someone is trying to be you

You may want to know about User:Vikser. --Damiens.rf 14:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

i think Damiens.rf is wanting to be you

Check again, and follow the path of Damiens.rf activity. I think he is the one forging IP's and Usernames to make his case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lebprofiler (talk • contribs) 21:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Flynn

Hello Vickser. I've found some evidence that the Irish League is not fully professional - see this Irish News article. Regards, пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:34, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Re. New Jersey School Report Card

Hello Vickser. I have withdrawn my nomination for deletion. You did a terrific job and I must concede defeat. Well done. I should hate you now for that, but I'll fare any anger good bye with some WikiLove below. Regards, Húsönd 13:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Here are some pebbles for you! Pebbles somehow promote WikiLove and hopefully these have made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! Húsönd 13:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

I have closed the AfD for New Jersey School Report Card as "keep"

You should be good to go on the DYK now. S. Dean Jameson 04:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! Vickser (talk) 04:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

No problem! Glad to be able to help. S. Dean Jameson 05:24, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

• Hey, sorry I forgot to remove the oldafd tag from the main article. I guess I must have just missed it. Thanks for fixing it for me. S. Dean Jameson 05:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

My talkpage...

Go away weirdo. Just kidding. You are more than welcome to ask anything you'd like at anytime on my talk, don't ever feel like you're "intruding" or anything. As you've quite likely learned already, my talkpage is ridiculous. Lots of eyes on it, so if you ever want something done (for example, your latest post), WP:AN/K has more views than User talk:Jimbo Wales, and over 10% of the views of WP:AN/I. I'm not really sure how that happened, but most issues on my talkpage get solved by someone other than me. Strangely, my stalkers leave the "difficult" ones for me to fix. Hmmm. Anyway, I've seen your name surface quite a bit in the AFD discussions, a venue I frequent, and want to say that I'm very impressed with your thoughtful and civil approach to the discussions, with a dab of humor even. It's refreshing to see someone do something there other than "delete per nom" followed by "keep per YOUSUCKNOM". Not to say that I'll always agree with your position necessarily, but I have certainly decided that your opinion will at the very least be well-founded, with the best interests of Wikipedia in mind. So, anywho, I'm a rambler, sorry 'bout the tldr, just wanted to drop by here. "I hope you like the place and decide to stay!" Cheers, Keeper | 76 | what's in a name? 16:07, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Journeyman

Comment copied from User talk:Gatoclass I saw you've got an under construction box on top of the next DYK template, so I didn't want to edit it myself, but I was wondering if you'd consider removing the word journeyman from the Mike Cervenak so it would read simply "... that infielder Mike Cervenak spent so much time as a member of the Norwich Navigators that the residents of the town dubbed him the "Mayor of Norwich"?" Journeyman's a pretty pejorative term, and it seems like some unnecessary editorializing to put on the front page. It was discussed on the template talk but never changed. Especially with a living person involved, I think it's better not to insult. Vickser (talk) 16:24, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah, sorry, I meant to do that myself, but I'm in such a hurry right now, as it's way past my bedtime I must have forgotten. Hang on a sec, I'll get rid of that now. Gatoclass (talk) 16:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Comment copied from User talk:Gatoclass Thank you! And by the way, thank you for taking care of the next updates so often. It seems like you've been one of the administrators who are really on top of it, and as new DYK addict, you get a ton of my gratitude. Thanks for keeping the updates coming, and I'll see you around! Vickser (talk) 16:33, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Well if I'm not "on top" of it by now I guess I never will be :) Thanks for your own assistance BTW, it's been very helpful to the updaters, I can assure you! Gatoclass (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Treehopper and Leafhopper

Vic, thanks lots for the work you are doing on the DYK project! I left a note in Template talk:Did you know beneath the Candy-striped Leafhopper and Buffalo Treehopper article. You may want to comment on my suggestion. - House of Scandal (talk) 04:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

All done and commented. Great suggestion, I think it improves DYK and doesn't have any negatives I can think of. Vickser (talk) 05:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I had originally posted the hook under July 14 but someone looked at the creation date and moved it. I know that people do series of articles and have seen runs in which every DYK has featured a Turkish politician or Ohio high school or whatever for days in a row. It's not optimal! - House of Scandal (talk) 05:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Star of the Day

WORKING WOMAN'S BARNSTAR Vickser, thanks for all your work auditing DYK submissions thoughtfully and well. It's very helpful for the project. I hope you keep submitting quality articles to DYK too. Best wishes. - House of Scandal (talk) 14:57, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! Vickser (talk) 15:22, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

New Jersey School Report Card

On 17 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article New Jersey School Report Card, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 05:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Spacecraft magnetometers

Hi. You're right that my hooks (one of which has now been selected for the next update) were a little clunky - I spent ages thinking but somehow couldn't quite get the prose right. I think yours is somewhat better: feel free to change it on the next update page if you want. Seems a slight shame that Bedford decided to drop the picture as I thought it was good - but then I have an obvious bias in addition to being the nominator!

Anyway, thanks for reviewing the nom. and catching my original error. Best, Olaf Davis | Talk 17:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

No problem! I had a lot of fun going through the article. I spent some time trying to think of a non-clunky way to write the hook, and quite simply, I'm not sure there is one. No matter what you do, "spacecraft magnetometer" just isn't going to flow well. Anyway, it was a good find and a great article, and i'm glad to see it making it's way to the front page, even if the awesome Luna 2 picture won't be there with it. Vickser (talk) 18:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Lexis Nexis link

Do you know how to make a permanent link to a Lexis Nexis document? I realize that not everyone has access to Lexis Nexis. But for those that do... I think it'd be nice to include a link in my referencs. For example, I placed this reference -- Bob_Barr#cite_note-CongressProfile1999-13 -- but haven't figured out how to place a link that doesn't expire. Thanks for your help. Noca2plus (talk) 00:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I'm not sure if you can provide a perma link to a lexis nexis document. Since there a bunch of different ways people can get into Lexis Nexis (some people have nexis side only, others get lexis only, there are a few different academic versions, some people have a LN username/pw, others use a proxy server or straight IP approval), I don't think there are stable links you can share that anyone using any type of LN could use. I searched around the site to see if anything quick came up on the help, but the only information about sharing talks about the emailing documents, downloading them to your computer or printing out, none of which are appropriate for wiki-sharing. When I'm citing a LN document, I'll just provide as much information as I can so that whoever wants to check it out for themselves can have an easy search.

Sorry I couldn't be more helpful. Vickser (talk) 01:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I saw the email option; but as you say, it just emails the text, not a permanent link. I appreciate you looking into it. Drop me a line if you ever figure out a way make such a link. Noca2plus (talk) 21:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

The image

It's for Robert F. Kennedy assassination - if you can help, I'd be very grateful, as I'm trying to get the article to FAC in the next 24-48 if I can Fritzpoll (talk) 22:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I already replied over at WP:AN/K, but if you stop by here first, the image is up at [1]. Just be sure to use it in the page before someone marks it as orphaned! Vickser (talk) 23:06, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Many, many thanks! If you look at the article, you'll see the result of your handiwork - the rationale looks good to me. FAC in 20 mins...just a few more checks Fritzpoll (talk) 23:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Looks good. It seems like a great article. Good luck on the FAC! Vickser (talk) 23:24, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks - I'll need it! Fritzpoll (talk) 23:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I really, really appreciated the help

		The Original Barnstar
		Regardless of how the FAC goes, your leaping in to give me a hand with the fair-use upload meant that I at least got that far. Many, many thanks Fritzpoll (talk) 16:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		For your well-intending prodding of discussion and then later clearing up the mess that I myself created when trying to clear up ... another mess! Thank you for helping make a path clear for future actions in regards to the Article Rescue Squadron. Banjeboi 22:42, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Pro Evolution Soccer 2009

Can you please stop people who aren't registered editing the page because I edited [Pro Evolution Soccer 2009]] with the correct information but now people are just vandalising the page!!!!

Please respond to this please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chaos d 2294 (talk • contribs) 20:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

I checked out the page and it looks like there was indeed a little bit of vandalism, but it's already been reverted. I'm not an administrator so I can't semi protect pages, nor do I think an administrator would approve a protection request right now since there's only been one small vandalism incident. To read more about when protection is appropriate, check out Wikipedia:Protection policy. In the future if you ever want to report a page for protection, you'll file a report at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Hope that helps! Vickser (talk) 21:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

RFA thankspam

Thanks for your support in my RFA, which passed with 140 supporting, 11 opposing, and 4 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have given to me. If I can ever assist you with anything, just ask.

Cheers!

J.delanoy^gabs_adds 20:07, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Michael Palacio

Why was michael palacio deleted that does not make sense he is on the ny red bulls he didnt get a chance to play because of a season ending injury but he did make his professional debut last year when he played in an open cup game.Mlsnews10 (talk) 03:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)jon

If you're interested in seeing why Michael Palacio was deleted, an archive of the debate is available here. In short, athletes must have played in a league match in a fully professional league (or at the Olympics, or World Cup, or a similar tourney). A debut in a friendly match wouldn't count. If Palacio ever plays in an MLS game, you should feel free to recreate the article. However, until that time it is likely the consensus will be that he is not yet notable enough to have an article. Vickser (talk) 04:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Credit

Thanks :) Gatoclass (talk) 07:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

It was the least I could do. Thanks for updating! Vickser (talk) 07:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:AN/G notification

User_talk:Giggy#Help_writing_an_image_request :-) —Giggy 09:41, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

RfB Thank You spam

Thank you for participating in my RfB! I am very grateful for the confidence of the community shown at my RfB, which passed by a count of 154/7/2 (95.65%). I have read every word of the RfB and taken it all to heart. I truly appreciate everyone's input: supports, opposes, neutrals, and comments. Of course, I plan to conduct my cratship in service of the community. If you have any advice, questions, concerns, or need help, please let me know. Again, Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 08:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Henry Conway

Nice looking article! My opinion of the "scandal" section is a bit harsh I'm afraid. I don't think it belongs there at all. The "scandal" is his father's scandal, and doesn't add to HC's notability/notoriety. The first paragraph, giving the background, never even mentions HC, only DC and FC. (HC wasn't part of the investigation). A "press" revelation that HC was also paid continued the investigation, therefore I think the entire thing can be pared down to one sentence with a ref.

As of July 2008, there is a House of Commons investigation as to whether Henry's father, MP Derek Conway, had misused taxpayer money by paying Henry, and his brother Frederick, to be research assistants for his office while the brothers were at university. (ref, ref, ref)

Any more than that, it's a bit coatrack-y for my tastes in a BLP article, especially one that's about to be on the main. I'll watch your talkpage, no need to reply at my ridiculous talkpage, unless you'd like to flame me :-) Cheers, Keeper ǀ 76 15:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for taking a look! You're right that I need to focus it somewhat more around Henry and maybe pare it down. I do think it needs a reasonable sized mention just because it became such a media circus and seemingly always gets substantial coverage in newspaper and magazine articles about Conway. It's also going to be what people know Henry Conway from. While he's gotten occasional cover stories since then (the most recent profile in independent, and the horse drawn carriage was used as a cover story at one tab), papers were using pictures of Henry and revelations about him (rather than his father) as their front page stories for prety much a whole week at the end of January/beginning of Feb.

What would you think if I changed the "Early life" section title to "Education and family" and made "Parliamentary payments scandal" a subsection of that with a paragraph reading:

In January 2008, Conway's MP father Derek was kicked from the Conservative Party after the Committee on Standards and Privileges of the House of Commons announced that he had misued taxpayer money by paying his son Frederick as a research assistant even though there was no record of Frederick's work. After press revelations that Henry Conway had been paid for the same position when he was an undergraduate, the Standards Committee announced in February 2008 that they would investigate whether or not Henry's employment was also in breach of normal protocol. As of July 2008, the investigation is ongoing. Derek Conway has maintained that both sons did work as research assistants and that the lack of records was merely a result of administrative shortcomings.

I think the essential points that need to be made are: 1. Derek Conway got in trouble for doing things wrong with Frederick. 2. Henry had the same position according to the press. 3. Parliament is holding an ongoing investigation into it. 4. Derek Conway denies that it was improper.

Does that sound good or would it still be too coatracky? Would moving it to a subsection in family even help? I mean, it decreases the importance by not giving it its own section, but it also moves it earlier in the article. I could also try keeping it as a section and shifting the focus to how the media covered Henry, which is something the more recent profiles of him have mentions of. But I worry if including things like "Paparazzi were following him everywhere! He got criticized for going partying while it was happening! Papers were running stories about his facebook profile!" gives undue weight to tabloids.

Thank you again so much for reviewing and advising. Vickser (talk) 20:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

It's definitely improved! I'm not completely convinced yet. What about starting it with an explicit sentence as to why this is in HC's article? Something along the lines of In January 2008, Henry was _________(not sure the word here, hrm, featured? criticized? written up? in the news? after his MP father, Derek...' (and then continue on with your good stuff. Explains why it's being added. I didn't realize that HC himself was the subject of the press matters beyond "he's DC's son". Keeper ǀ 76 20:38, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, I went ahead and added your revised section to the article. I renamed the section but I'm still not totally happy with my new title, but I don't think it should go any "higher" in the article body or be called what it was called, maybe you can think of something better? I of course, gave you full credit for the overhaul in my edit summary :-) Let me know when it hits the main! Keeper ǀ 76 21:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Family controversy is definitely a better title than the old one, but it still feels off. Maybe "Parliamentary payments investigation"? I don't know. I think I'll probably also add a sentence or two describing the press coverage. Maybe "As a result of the controversy, Henry came under intense media scrutiny, with Liz Smith of The Daily Mail saying the press had "opened up and prodded [him] like an albino mouse in a dissection class."[2] Vickser (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

I've always loved it when a reliable source uses a ridiculous quote that we can add :-). Excellent addition, and overall, an excellent bio. Thanks for pinging me about this one, I learned something new this week (I'd never heard of HC, being from la-la-land and all). Cheers, great work! Keeper ǀ 76 19:35, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help. I'll stop by your page and let you know when it ends up on the front page. And you totally have my permission to start claiming you've done a DYK. :) Vickser (talk) 20:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Never! I am actually ridiculously proud of the fact that I've never brought anything through GA, FA, or DYK. I'm a behind the scenes guy, a bit chatty for my own liking, and I love love love to help other, moar SRS editors find their way through the mess of politics on this zany little site. The DYK is all yours my friend, the only thing I did was tell you that a section sucked, made you revise it, and then copy/pasted your revision. :-) If that earns me a DYK nod, then I've gotten hundreds at this point :-) Cheers good editor, Keeper ǀ 76 20:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Image:Common galaxias, Galaxias maculatus.jpg

I notice you have replaced this image on the the Common galaxias page. I have niminated this image for deletion because of its poor quality. Also, this image is not G.maculatus. I do not wish to engage in a revert war with you over this, but please see my comments on the article talk page.Nick Thorne ^talk 09:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

I certainly don't want to get in a revert war with you either! I acually found the image through its IfD, where the only reason I saw given was poor quality. Since a google image search turned up a good number of fish that looked to me like the same species, I figured we'd be better with a thumbnail of less than perfect quality than no image at all and went ahead and added it in to the article and commented to that effect on the IfD. I didn't even think to check the article's talk page, so I didn't see your comment there.

To me it does look like the same species, but I'm certainly not a fish expert, so if you're confident it's not the same species then I'll believe you. While I do think a poor quality image is better than no image at all for a species article like Common galaxias, a poor quality image that isn't the type of fish it claims to be and that we can't identify as another type is certainly not worth keeping.

I'd encourage you to expand the IfD nomination to explain that this isn't actually the image of the fish it says it is. I think that information is very relevant to the debate. Vickser (talk) 09:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Just to expand, I noticed the reason you gave on the talk page was that Common galaxias doesn't have a black stripe. However, the Australian Museum [3] has an image of a G.maculatus that does indeed have the black stripe and looks (to me) like the same fish. You might want to take a look at that and see if you still think it's not the same. (Again, not a fish expert, so I'll trust you on it if you are, and if neither of us are, we could try asking Wikiproject Fish.) Vickser (talk) 09:42, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

I have looked at the AM site and the top photo certainly would give you the impression of a black stripe, but I think it is a lighting issue. The lower image is more like what the fish really looks like. I have handled many G.maculatus and although their colouration is somewhat variable, the most obvious characteristic of their markings are small verticle stripes or blotches. I have never seen one with a distinct black horizontal stripe. Now, I agree that it is possible that the same thing is happening in the image in question, but it is very misleading to use this image as a representation of the species. As for my qualifications, I am not a fish biologist, but I am National Secretary of Native Fish Australia, I have been actively involved in the native fish scene here for about 18 years, I have handled this species many, many times and I have run the NFA web site (www.nativefish.asn.au) since its inception in around 1996, for what that is worth, plus my library has most of the books commonly used for Australian native fish identification, and before I posted anything about this image, I double checked in 5 of those titles. Nick Thorne ^talk 13:00, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

That's more than good enough for me, and I feel comfortable deferring to you on the issue. I removed the image from the galaxias page and commented on the IfD [4] changing my !vote from keep to delete. Thank you for stopping by and for figuring out this whole affair. Having a picture of the wrong fish up would have been quite damaging to the encyclopedia, and I applaud you for finding and fixing it. Vickser (talk) 19:16, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

DYK

Comment copied from User Talk:Admrboltz I just wanted to apologize if I ended up edit-conflicting with you on the DYK/N template. I had a few extra screens up because I was double checking if the Lloyd Green hook was okay since it was expiring and a new cited hook had been suggested, and so I didn't see the "Update happening now" until after a few "someone has recently edited this page" things. So, apologies if my edit ended up conflicting with any of yours, and thank you for doing the update. Vickser (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

No issues :) If you want to add the article credits on the pages, I have done the user credits. --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Comment copied from User Talk:Admrboltz I'll go do the article credits. Thanks! Vickser (talk) 04:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Cool - thanks for your help. --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:17, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

DYK

Thanks for the compliment on Seventy-fourth Oregon Legislative Assembly! I'll be working to add more detail to it. Not sure what happened to it, procedure-wise, as it dropped off the page without appearing on the main page...but I trust that's just how these things go. (DYK has always been a bit mysterious to me, but things always seem to work out in the end ;) Thanks again. -Pete (talk) 23:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Your article's actually currently on the next update. [5] Hooks get taken off the main listing when they get moved there, and from there they get moved to the main page. If I were you, I'd be expecting a DYK message in the next few hours. Great job again on the article! Vickser (talk) 00:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

DYK - Henry Conway

On 2 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henry Conway, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Rudget 19:32, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: C. Ronaldo

Wow! When I saw that I had a new message, I was expecting a complaint about removal of content from the article, and imagine my surprise when I instead came upon a lovely blue star. :o) Thank you very much; this made the effort all worth it. Beemer69 ^chitchat 01:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

It was well deserved. You've been doing an excellent job on the article! Vickser (talk) 01:28, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Any other footballer article(s) you think need tidying up? Beemer69 ^chitchat 21:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Wayne Rooney is begging for a rewrite. In addition to dedicating about as much space to the stomping red card he got in the 2006 FIFA World Cup as it does talking about the whole rest of his international career, the article is filled with nonsense phrases like "In a strange quirk of fate". Another good option would be Frank Lampard. It has tense issues, outdated speculation, inconsistancies from one season to the next, and just plain old bad prose. Either would be great choices for clean up. Vickser (talk) 21:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Rooney cleanup completed over a course of three days; article is now 13,600 KB shorter. Phew. :) I'm taking a breather before moving on to Lampard. Beemer69 ^chitchat 03:57, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

I've been following the clean up on my watchlist. Looks like you did another amazing job. Vickser (talk) 04:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Just finished the Lampard article, and I'm exhausted. :) Beemer69 ^chitchat 04:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks!

Thank you... ...for participating in my RfA, which closed with 119 in support, 4 neutral and 5 opposes. I'm honestly overwhelmed at the level of support that I've received from the community, and will do my best to maintain the trust placed in me. I 'm also thankful to those who opposed or expressed a neutral position, for providing clear rationales and superb feedback for me to build on. I've set up a space for you to provide any further feedback or thoughts, should you feel inclined to. However you voted, thanks for taking the time out to contribute to the process, it's much appreciated. Kind regards, Gazimoff 21:55, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

My Grandfather's Son DYK

On 7 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article My Grandfather's Son, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 20:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Your question about your sister

I know exactly what you are talking about.even thought I dont believe in any god I know a lot about religion.

Beliving in God and not Jesus Christ is not likey a Catholic or protestant follow but a Jewish foolowing.

Jews believe that there is a god and noone else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noblessing (talk • contribs) 00:49, 12 August 2008

Just to clarify, I didn't ask the question about whoever's sister's salvation it was over at media copyright questions. I simply replied that it was not an appropriate forum for such a question and that the IP would have to search elsewhere for his answers. So, I'm a bit confused by the above message, but welcome to wikipedia and feel free to let me know if there's anything (non-salvation related) that I may help out with. Vickser (talk) 01:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

RFK assassination FA

Vickser, without your picture, this wouldn't have gone through, and lord knows, I had no idea what I was doing with the copyright tags. I think you can count this as a significant contribution if you'd like - honestly couldn't have done it without you! Fritzpoll (talk) 13:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

It was nothing! Heck, I didn't even get the tag exactly right the first time around. That said, I'm glad I was able to help out a bit, and congratulations again on the FA. Vickser (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Someone attacked you on your talk page

Hi there, some IP user attacked you on your talk page. Don't worry, I have removed it. If you want to see the message, you can look it up in the page's history. Also there's no need to warn the user, I have already. Thanks. Techman224 (talk) 15:56, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Greetings

Semi-namesake! Tim Vickers (talk) 03:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Issue 2 (January 2010) Previous issue | Next issue

Content

The community is currently

deciding whether

60,000

articles should be deleted.

background

• News items and announcements
• Contest

• Featured editor: Teeninvestor
• Featured administrator: WereSpielChequers

• Want ads
• Feature: FeydHuxtable: Search Techniques

DJ Khalil

Can you retrieve some good sources for DJ Khalil from ProQuest? I was looking at this article and noticed it still has zero reliable sources cited and saw that you said you found some during an AFD last year. I was going to renominate it tonight but thought I'd drop you a line first. JBsupreme (talk) 09:46, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Economics census

Hello there. Sorry to bother you, but you are (titularly at least) a member of WP:WikiProject Economics, as defined by this category. If you don't know me, I'm a Wikipedia administrator, but an unqualified economist. I enjoy writing about economics, but I'm not very good at it, which is why I would like to support in any way I can the strong body of economists here on Wikipedia. I'm only bothering you because you are probably one of them. Together, I'd like us to establish the future direction of WikiProject Economics, but first, we need to know who we've got to help.

Whatever your area of expertise or level of qualification, if you're interested in helping with the WikiProject (even if only as part of a larger commitment to this wonderful online encyclopedia of ours), would you mind adding your signature to this page? It only takes a second. Thank you.

Message delivered on behalf of User:Jarry1250 by LivingBot.

Survey

Hi Vickser!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 03:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Henry Conway

As a contributor to this article, you may be interested to know I have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Conway. Robofish (talk) 01:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Vickser! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by: Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 05:06, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Vickser! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by: Visiting our website for resources, events, and more Meet other women and share your story in our profile space Participate at and "like" our Facebook group Join the conversation on our Twitter feed Reading and writing for our blog channel Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience! Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:25, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!