Orphan, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 00:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons — this image may be useful to someone else. —Remember the dot(talk) 04:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Signet ring.jpg is a similar image of the same object which is being used in articles. There was apparently some thought that these were actually photoshop-altered images of the original when they were first posted (see User talk:Larry laptop/archive 1#Image Concerns). I have no way to judge if they are photoshopped, but they are orphans. ~ BigrTex 14:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Absent uploader BigrTex 00:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons — this image may be useful to someone else. —Remember the dot(talk) 04:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The name of this image implies that it was part of Celtic Toe (see also AfD). Labeling on the image makes it seem possibly useful for Morton's Toe, but the image there (Image:Mortons toe.JPG) is significantly more encyclopedic. In terms of Toe Ring, the uploader has two other images Image:Toe ring.jpg (in use on the article) and Image:Toering.jpg (which I nominated for deletion as an orphan here), either of which are more useful than this image. ~ BigrTex 14:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 00:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons — this image may be useful to someone else. —Remember the dot(talk) 04:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image was apparently uploaded for use on Celtic Toe. I believe the image to be unencyclopedic based on the outcome of the AfD. ~ BigrTex 14:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Absent uploader BigrTex 00:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons — this image may be useful to someone else. —Remember the dot(talk) 04:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Image was apparently uploaded for use on Celtic Toe. I believe the image to be unencyclopedic based on the outcome of the AfD. ~ BigrTex 14:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Magazine cover used only to illustrate the article about the person on the cover. This fails the fair-use criteria; see the seventh fair-use counterexample. —Bkell (talk) 02:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That would be great, except that it's not orphaned, so orfud is inappropriate. —Bkell (talk) 04:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As its use is in violation of the Wikipedia:Fair use policy, I removed the image from that article. It is now orphaned. Sorry for not checking to see whether or not it was orphaned before marking it as such. —Remember the dot(talk) 04:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
For future reference, if it were orphaned I would have tagged it with orfud myself; instead I listed it here. I'm not sure if there's any benefit to orfud'ing it after it's been listed on IFD, since the IFD process takes five days and the orfud process takes a week, and either way some administrator is going to have to delete it. —Bkell (talk) 04:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Up-loader claims to have created what is presented as the cover of a recording; no source is given, and it's unclear what status it has. — Mel Etitis (Talk) 21:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
non-orphaned image, but there are three different images that have been uploaded under this name. There is no license and the source (as given in upload summary and since removed from page) states it was taken by the school's marketing department. Given it is likely fair use (a marketing picutre) and it would easily be replacable by a free image. User:Gay Cdn(talk)(Contr) 21:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
