Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Unnale Unnale/1

Unnale Unnale edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted Consensus is that some of the sources aren't reliable. Szzuk (talk) 11:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting problems in Cast and Soundtrack sections
Generally not up to par with other Indian cinema GAs, with some very brief sections and not many sources
Many sources are from websites considered unreliable in other Indian cinema GA reviews, including blogs and gossip sites

BollyJeff || talk 15:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The GA criteria do not require the article to be "up to par" compared to other articles, because we're not grading on a curve. They also do not require any particular system of formatting. So your first two complaints are irrelevant: Articles are not delisted for these reasons.
Your last complaint could be significant. I suggest that you use {{Verify credibility}} to identify the specific sources that you believe are unacceptable so that others can consider whether these sources are being used appropriate. (No source is always unreliable.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:45, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone ahead and fixed some of the formatting issues that were considered unimportant by some. Now we just need to deal with sourcing issue. BollyJeff || talk 13:37, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article doesn't look that bad now you've edited it. Again the main issue for me is sourcing. All dodgy sources should be replaced.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:29, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]