Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Triarii/1

Triarii edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page

Result: Removed. Since you improved the article after failed nomination, it should go through the normal Good article nomination process. Ruslik (talk) 18:59, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article failed GA review by all criteria except neutrality, and I was told it wouldn't even make B class. I think it is worthy of GA status, I've referenced everything, and I don't think there's anything I haven't covered. I'm fairly sure it's neutral, and the stability issues have been resolved. I haven't been able to find any images.--Serviam (talk) 16:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's stable for now because I don't have to nerve to see every edit reverted. While it may look good on a superficial look, a glance at the sources shows that the article contradicts some of the newer material. Another issue is that the article is largely based on sources from the 19th century. Wandalstouring (talk) 14:30, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]